Skip to content

Fix carbontracker doi #850

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
slesaad merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2026
+1 −1
Merged

Fix carbontracker doi #850

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion datasets/ct-ch4-monthgrid-v2023.data.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ layers:
- The STAC ID for the previous version (v1) in the [US GHG Center STAC Catalog](https://radiantearth.github.io/stac-browser/#/external/earth.gov/ghgcenter/api/stac/?.language=en) is tm54dvar-ch4flux-monthgrid-v1

## Dataset Accuracy
Evaluating the accuracy and uncertainty of gridded emissions data is challenging because of the lack of direct physical measurements on grid scales. The emissions presented here were transported by an atmospheric model, and the resulting methane and ¹³C of methane fields were compared to atmospheric measurements of methane and ¹³C of methane globally over multiple decades. Under that transformation and within the bounds of model and observational uncertainty, these emissions satisfy the spatial patterns and time trends seen in the atmospheric measurements. More information about the model-data comparison and evaluation of the model results can be found at: [https://doi.org/10.25925/40jt-qd67](https://doi.org/10.25925/40jt-qd67).
Evaluating the accuracy and uncertainty of gridded emissions data is challenging because of the lack of direct physical measurements on grid scales. The emissions presented here were transported by an atmospheric model, and the resulting methane and ¹³C of methane fields were compared to atmospheric measurements of methane and ¹³C of methane globally over multiple decades. Under that transformation and within the bounds of model and observational uncertainty, these emissions satisfy the spatial patterns and time trends seen in the atmospheric measurements. More information about the model-data comparison and evaluation of the model results can be found at: [https://doi.org/10.25925/hxks-v755](https://doi.org/10.25925/hxks-v755).

## Disclaimer
This dataset has been transformed from its original format (NetCDF) into Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF ([COG](https://www.cogeo.org/)) for display in the US GHG Center. Careful quality checks are used to ensure data transformation has been performed correctly.
Expand Down