This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Site shapefile and map #15
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ge.yml Merge branch 'master' of github.com:USGS-R/2wp-temp-observations into summarize_sites # Conflicts: # 5_data_munge.yml # 5_data_munge/src/munge_data_files.R
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not ready for merge yet.
Builds and writes a shapefile with site lat/lons and count of dates with observations. However, this shapefile has many sites clearly outside the USA borders.
Builds a map (currently subset to just a random sample of 10000 points) showing n_dates. However, this map uses a boring projection, doesn't relocate AK or HI or PR, might be using a slow geometry intersection method(?), and is not pretty. Sam has made prettier ones before.
Because they're so unfinished, neither of these scipiper targets actually gets pushed to Drive at the moment. Also, because the upstream targets were threatening to repull data, the current code is disconnected from the pipeline for retrieval of those targets. It should be run line-by-line rather than via scipiper for now, and should be edited to connect to the pipeline in the future.