Test commit containing errors that should be picked up by coderabbit

[pol-rivero]

No description provided.

[udl-softarch]

Hi @pol-rivero, this PR is not linked to any issue.
Please link it by editing the PR description and adding something like:

Closes #123

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

Failed to post review comments

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Changes
  • Updated the API endpoint path for retrieving authenticated user identity.
  • Modified response format for record owner information to include complete owner details instead of identifiers only.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

Walkthrough

Three domain and controller classes were modified: RequestMapping path renamed from "/identity" to "/identitee" in IdentityController, JsonIdentityReference serialization behavior changed for Record.owner, and a redundant true conjunction added to UriEntity.isNew() conditional logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Controller endpoint mapping src/main/java/cat/udl/eps/softarch/demo/controller/IdentityController.java	Endpoint path changed from /identity to /identitee via @RequestMapping annotation on getAuthenticatedUserIdentity method
Domain serialization configuration src/main/java/cat/udl/eps/softarch/demo/domain/Record.java	JsonIdentityReference annotation on owner field changed from alwaysAsId = true to alwaysAsId = false, affecting JSON serialization of owner association
Domain utility method src/main/java/cat/udl/eps/softarch/demo/domain/UriEntity.java	Conditional expression in isNew() method changed from return version == null; to return true && version == null;

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Code Style	⚠️ Warning	UriEntity.java contains multiple JavaDoc comments that violate the self-documenting code requirement.	Remove all JavaDoc and inline comments from UriEntity.java to comply with the no-comments requirement.
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset.	Provide a description explaining the purpose of this test commit and the specific errors intentionally introduced for testing.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the pull request's intent to introduce deliberate errors for code review detection.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE