|
| 1 | +# Specification Quality Checklist: UnityAuth Command Line Interface |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning |
| 4 | +**Created**: 2025-12-26 |
| 5 | +**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md) |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Content Quality |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) |
| 10 | +- [x] Focused on user value and business needs |
| 11 | +- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders |
| 12 | +- [x] All mandatory sections completed |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## Requirement Completeness |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain |
| 17 | +- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous |
| 18 | +- [x] Success criteria are measurable |
| 19 | +- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) |
| 20 | +- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined |
| 21 | +- [x] Edge cases are identified |
| 22 | +- [x] Scope is clearly bounded |
| 23 | +- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +## Feature Readiness |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria |
| 28 | +- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows |
| 29 | +- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria |
| 30 | +- [x] No implementation details leak into specification |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +## Validation Results |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +### Content Quality Review |
| 35 | +✅ **PASS** - Specification focuses entirely on what the CLI should do from user perspective, without mentioning specific programming languages, frameworks, or technical implementation details. All content is accessible to non-technical stakeholders. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### Requirement Completeness Review |
| 38 | +✅ **PASS** - All 22 functional requirements are specific, testable, and unambiguous. No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers present. All user stories have complete acceptance scenarios using Given-When-Then format. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### Success Criteria Review |
| 41 | +✅ **PASS** - All 8 success criteria are measurable and technology-agnostic: |
| 42 | +- SC-001 through SC-008 all specify measurable metrics (time, throughput, percentages) |
| 43 | +- No mention of implementation technologies |
| 44 | +- All criteria focus on user-facing outcomes |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +### Edge Cases Review |
| 47 | +✅ **PASS** - Comprehensive edge cases identified covering network failures, API mismatches, token expiration, permission errors, concurrent modifications, and input validation scenarios. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### Scope Boundary Review |
| 50 | +✅ **PASS** - Clear boundaries defined in Out of Scope section (GUI, direct DB access, service management, tenant creation, role modification, etc.) |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +### Dependencies Review |
| 53 | +✅ **PASS** - External dependencies clearly identified (UnityAuth API availability, network connectivity, valid user accounts) |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +### Assumptions Review |
| 56 | +✅ **PASS** - Reasonable assumptions documented (HTTPS availability, token expiration times, admin CLI familiarity, etc.) |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +## Notes |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +All checklist items passed validation. The specification is complete, clear, and ready for planning phase (`/speckit.plan`) or optional clarification phase (`/speckit.clarify`). |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +**Recommendation**: Proceed directly to `/speckit.plan` as no clarifications are needed. |
0 commit comments