Skip to content

Commit 9718729

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #48 from UnityFoundation-io/001-unityauth-cli
001 unityauth cli
2 parents a3594ae + d51274c commit 9718729

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

52 files changed

+11236
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 62 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
1+
# Specification Quality Checklist: UnityAuth Command Line Interface
2+
3+
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
4+
**Created**: 2025-12-26
5+
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
6+
7+
## Content Quality
8+
9+
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
10+
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
11+
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
12+
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
13+
14+
## Requirement Completeness
15+
16+
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
17+
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
18+
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
19+
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
20+
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
21+
- [x] Edge cases are identified
22+
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
23+
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
24+
25+
## Feature Readiness
26+
27+
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
28+
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
29+
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
30+
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
31+
32+
## Validation Results
33+
34+
### Content Quality Review
35+
**PASS** - Specification focuses entirely on what the CLI should do from user perspective, without mentioning specific programming languages, frameworks, or technical implementation details. All content is accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
36+
37+
### Requirement Completeness Review
38+
**PASS** - All 22 functional requirements are specific, testable, and unambiguous. No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers present. All user stories have complete acceptance scenarios using Given-When-Then format.
39+
40+
### Success Criteria Review
41+
**PASS** - All 8 success criteria are measurable and technology-agnostic:
42+
- SC-001 through SC-008 all specify measurable metrics (time, throughput, percentages)
43+
- No mention of implementation technologies
44+
- All criteria focus on user-facing outcomes
45+
46+
### Edge Cases Review
47+
**PASS** - Comprehensive edge cases identified covering network failures, API mismatches, token expiration, permission errors, concurrent modifications, and input validation scenarios.
48+
49+
### Scope Boundary Review
50+
**PASS** - Clear boundaries defined in Out of Scope section (GUI, direct DB access, service management, tenant creation, role modification, etc.)
51+
52+
### Dependencies Review
53+
**PASS** - External dependencies clearly identified (UnityAuth API availability, network connectivity, valid user accounts)
54+
55+
### Assumptions Review
56+
**PASS** - Reasonable assumptions documented (HTTPS availability, token expiration times, admin CLI familiarity, etc.)
57+
58+
## Notes
59+
60+
All checklist items passed validation. The specification is complete, clear, and ready for planning phase (`/speckit.plan`) or optional clarification phase (`/speckit.clarify`).
61+
62+
**Recommendation**: Proceed directly to `/speckit.plan` as no clarifications are needed.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)