feat: add issue templates

Author: vazor-code

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/✨-feature-request.md

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+---
+name: "✨ Feature request"
+about: Suggest an idea for this project
+title: "[FEATURE] "
+labels: enhancement
+assignees: ''
+
+---
+
+## ✨ Feature summary
+
+**Describe the feature or improvement clearly and concisely.**  
+What problem does it solve? What value does it add?
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Motivation
+
+Why is this feature important?
+
+- What pain point does it address?
+- Who would benefit from it?
+- Is this related to security, performance, DX, or CI?
+
+---
+
+## 🧠 Proposed solution
+
+Describe how you imagine this feature working.
+
+- New CLI flag?
+- New configuration option?
+- New rule type?
+- Behavior change?
+
+Example (if applicable):
+```bash
+secretscout scan . --new-feature
+````
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 Alternatives considered
+
+Have you considered alternative approaches?
+
+* Different CLI syntax?
+* Configuration-only solution?
+* External tooling?
+
+Explain why the proposed solution is preferred.
+
+---
+
+## ⚠️ Scope & constraints
+
+Please consider:
+
+* Should this be **optional** or **enabled by default**?
+* Any performance impact?
+* Any backward compatibility concerns?
+* Does this affect pre-commit or CI behavior?
+
+---
+
+## 🔐 Security considerations
+
+Does this feature introduce any security or privacy concerns?
+
+* [ ] No
+* [ ] Yes (please explain below)
+
+> SecretScout is **defensive-only**.
+> Features that enable offensive use will not be accepted.
+
+---
+
+## 🧪 How should this be tested?
+
+Describe how this feature could be tested:
+
+* CLI usage examples
+* Expected output
+* Edge cases
+
+---
+
+## 🧩 Additional context
+
+Add any other context, references, or examples:
+
+* Related tools or projects
+* Links to issues or discussions
+* Screenshots / mockups (if relevant)
+
+---
+
+🙏 Thank you for helping shape the future of **SecretScout**!

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/🐛-bug-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+---
+name: "\U0001F41B Bug report"
+about: Report a bug or unexpected behavior in SecretScout
+title: "[BUG] "
+labels: bug
+assignees: ''
+
+---
+
+## 🐞 Bug description
+
+**Describe the bug clearly and concisely.**  
+What went wrong? What did you expect instead?
+
+---
+
+## 🔁 Steps to reproduce
+
+Steps to reproduce the behavior:
+
+1. Run command:
+```bash
+   secretscout scan .
+```
+
+2. Use configuration:
+
+   * `.secretscout.toml`: yes / no
+   * `.secretscoutignore`: yes / no
+3. See error / unexpected output
+
+> ⚠️ **Do not include real secrets.**
+> Use dummy values only (e.g. `ghp_aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa`).
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Expected behavior
+
+A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
+
+---
+
+## ❌ Actual behavior
+
+What actually happened?
+Include error messages, incorrect output, or unexpected results.
+
+---
+
+## 📄 Command output / logs
+
+If applicable, paste relevant output here:
+
+```text
+(secretscout output or traceback)
+```
+
+> Secrets in logs **must be redacted**.
+
+---
+
+## 🖥️ Environment
+
+Please complete the following information:
+
+* OS: (e.g. Windows 11, Ubuntu 22.04, macOS Sonoma)
+* Python version:
+
+  ```bash
+  python --version
+  ```
+* SecretScout version:
+
+  ```bash
+  secretscout --version
+  ```
+* Installation method:
+
+  * [ ] Editable install (`pip install -e .`)
+  * [ ] PyPI (if applicable)
+  * [ ] Other
+
+---
+
+## 🧷 Git / Pre-commit context (if relevant)
+
+* Is this running via **pre-commit**?
+
+  * [ ] Yes
+  * [ ] No
+* Command used:
+
+  ```bash
+  secretscout scan --staged ...
+  ```
+
+---
+
+## 📸 Screenshots (optional)
+
+If applicable, add screenshots to help explain the problem.
+
+---
+
+## 🧠 Additional context
+
+Add any other context that might help us understand or reproduce the issue:
+
+* custom rules
+* baseline usage
+* CI environment
+* large repositories
+* performance-related notes
+
+---
+
+🙏 Thank you for helping improve **SecretScout**!