Skip to content

Single table sorting#138

Merged
ryanrdoherty merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
single-table-sorting
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

Single table sorting#138
ryanrdoherty merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
single-table-sorting

Conversation

@ryanrdoherty
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

// if asked to sort, append generated order-by clause
return !sort ? wrapped :
wrapped + getOrderByClause(_question.getRecordClass().getPrimaryKeyDefinition(),
_sortingMap, _question.getAttributeFieldMap(), Optional.of("inq."));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i don't understand Optional.of("inq.")

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just used the same alias as the previous code. See lines 524 and 531 at left. Did not check where it came from.

Copy link
Collaborator

@steve-fischer-200 steve-fischer-200 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i left one comment

@ryanrdoherty ryanrdoherty merged commit 6818f87 into master Mar 12, 2026
1 check passed
@ryanrdoherty ryanrdoherty deleted the single-table-sorting branch March 12, 2026 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants