Support Gray-Mode + Github Issues Modernisation

[simonprovost]

Hi @soniacq,

Hope all is well :) here is a quick docs-oriented PR to (1) support light and dark mode for the ReadME, as well as (2) modernise our GitHub issues templates to be more 2025-kind of templates!

Hope that's all fine, let me know.

Here is a quick video to recap it all visually speaking

PRVideoCompressed.mp4

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://UrbanMapper--78.org.readthedocs.build/en/78/

[simonprovost]

Friendly up reminder, @soniacq or @fabiofelix 🙏

[soniacq]

Great update!
Dark/light mode support and modernized YAML issue templates improve UX and contributor experience. Two minor notes: there’s an official logo for dark backgrounds (also used on the official OSCUR website) that we may want to use instead of the gray one you created—I’m attaching it here.

Also, which logo is shown by default, light or dark background? I think light would be better. Otherwise, ready to merge.

[simonprovost]

Great update! Dark/light mode support and modernized YAML issue templates improve UX and contributor experience. Two minor notes: there’s an official logo for dark backgrounds (also used on the official OSCUR website) that we may want to use instead of the gray one you created—I’m attaching it here.

Also, which logo is shown by default, light or dark background? I think light would be better. Otherwise, ready to merge.

Brills! Thanks for taking the time to focus this PR @soniacq 🙏 All modified, and fixed-up :)!

• New dark-mode logo is the official one (my bad btw!)
• Default is always light-mode logo

Cheers

[soniacq]

Please address the issue regarding the logo selection based on the background. Thanks!

[simonprovost]

Please address the issue regarding the logo selection based on the background. Thanks!

All good now and rebased with main following recent merge 🥳

Cheers

[soniacq]

Thank @simonprovost, for addressing all the requested changes. Ready to merge.

[simonprovost]

Thank @simonprovost, for addressing all the requested changes. Ready to merge.

Brills! Thanks Sonia! Just rebased with main and pushed

[soniacq]

Thank @simonprovost, for addressing all the requested changes. Ready to merge.

Brills! Thanks Sonia! Just rebased with main and pushed

@simonprovost Tests / test (3.12) is failing. Any idea what could be causing this?
@fabiofelix any thoughts?

Thank you!

[simonprovost]

Thank @simonprovost, for addressing all the requested changes. Ready to merge.

Brills! Thanks Sonia! Just rebased with main and pushed

@simonprovost Tests / test (3.12) is failing. Any idea what could be causing this? @fabiofelix any thoughts?

Thank you!

Re running in debug-mode now... strange right!

[simonprovost]

@soniacq I am suspecting a change on OSM’s side (I’m bedazzled though if it’s true); so I’ve de-emphasized the distance strictness in the tests that were failing when querying OSM. While I don’t like being out of scope, let’s consider this a hotfix in the current PR — all good?

Hoping it goes through; locally it did