Code under Apache 2.0 · Documentation under CC BY 4.0
Aurora Workflow Orchestration (AWO)
A formal method for reproducible AI-assisted research
• Falsifiability • Provenance • Attestation • Auditability
• Works manually or via CRI-CORE automation
• Every artifact is signed, structured, and verifiable
AWO is a reproducibility framework for AI-assisted research — turning every run into a verifiable scientific artifact.
Aurora Workflow Orchestration (AWO) defines how AI-assisted research can be made reproducible and auditable.
It translates reasoning steps, decisions, and evidence into structured files that anyone can verify.
AWO is the methodology layer — it governs how reproducibility works.
CRI-CORE is the execution layer — it automates that governance.
Together they form a single, evidence-based research system.
Idea → Manifest → Run → Audit → Attestation → Archive
|________ Governance Rules (AWO) ________|
↓
|_____ Enforcement (CRI-CORE) ____|
This repository contains the complete AWO governance layer — the foundation for reproducible, falsifiable AI research.
Core Documents
- Whitepaper (PDF) — Rationale and design philosophy
- Method Spec (PDF) — Normative rules for compliance
- Adoption Guide (PDF) — Step-by-step onboarding
Governance & Evidence
GOVERNANCE_SUMMARY.md— Compliance and attestation recordsROLE_ATTESTATION.md— Role-level verification summaryAWO_Compliance_Report.md— Signed compliance certification
Design & Provenance
- Architecture Decision Records (
/decisions/ADR-0001→ADR-0018) - Validation Schemas (
/schemas/) and Templates (/templates/) - Reproducible Runs (
/runs/) with frozen manifests and signed approvals
All content is cryptographically verified through SHA256SUMS.txt
and governed by ADR-0015 → ADR-0018 under the Aurora Research Initiative.
AI now generates discoveries faster than science can verify them.
The result is insight without integrity.
AWO is the countermeasure — a governance layer that forces every idea to prove itself before it earns the name “knowledge.”
Core Principles
- Falsifiability First – every claim must define how it can fail.
- Human-in-the-Loop Rigor – AI output remains a hypothesis until verified.
- Immutable Provenance – every artifact is signed, hashed, and auditable.
- Transparent Governance – reproducibility replaces reputation.
AWO turns the scientific method into a living protocol for evidence.
You don’t need special tools or a PhD in YAML to use AWO.
If you can commit to a Git repo, you can commit to reproducibility.
-
Clone or fork this repository
git clone https://github.com/Waveframe-Labs/Aurora-Workflow-Orchestration.git cd Aurora-Workflow-Orchestration -
Open the Adoption Guide
→docs/AWO_Adoption_Guide.md
It walks you through creating your first falsifiability manifest and recording an attested run. -
Inspect a verified example
Browse/runs/to see how manifests, approvals, and logs form a complete provenance chain.
| Tier | Audience | What It Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Individuals | Manual logs + falsifiability manifests |
| Standard | Small teams | CI pipelines + attestation workflows |
| Full | Institutions | Automated reproducibility via CRI-CORE |
| Project | Domain | Mode of Use |
|---|---|---|
| Waveframe v4.0 | Cosmology | Manual orchestration with falsifiability logs and ADRs |
| Societal Simulator | Systems modeling | Demonstrates reproducibility without automation |
| CRI-CORE | Research runtime | Automated orchestration and provenance enforcement |
Is AWO useful if I work alone?
Absolutely. AWO scales from solo projects to full institutions. If you’re a lab of one with coffee and conviction, it still works.Do I need CRI-CORE to use AWO?
No. AWO is fully functional on its own. CRI-CORE just automates what you can already do manually.Does AWO replace peer review?
Not at all. It strengthens it — by ensuring every claim and artifact is traceable before publication.Can I publish AWO-based research?
Yes. Include the AWO concept DOI (10.5281/zenodo.17013612) in your Methods or reproducibility statement.- ❌ A software package — it’s a method with optional automation.
- ❌ A belief system — it’s governance, not gospel.
- ❌ Dependent on institutions — reproducibility is the credential.
- ❌ Too heavy for individuals — AWO scales down cleanly to one researcher.
Version Boundary
AWO v1.2.1 (Documentation and Accessibility Update) marks the finalization of the AWO methodology under Waveframe Labs governance.
Future updates appear only as errata or citation additions.
Canonical DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17013612
If you reference or build upon AWO, please cite using the concept DOI.
APA
Wright, S. C. (2025). Aurora Workflow Orchestration (AWO): A formal framework for reproducible AI-assisted research.
Waveframe Labs / Aurora Research Initiative. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17013612
BibTeX
@software{wright_aurora_workflow_orchestration_2025,
author = {Wright, Shawn C.},
title = {Aurora Workflow Orchestration (AWO): A formal framework for reproducible AI-assisted research},
year = {2025},
version = {1.2.1},
institution = {Waveframe Labs / Aurora Research Initiative},
license = {Apache-2.0 (code), CC BY 4.0 (docs)},
url = {https://github.com/Waveframe-Labs/Aurora-Workflow-Orchestration},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.17013612}
}- Code → Apache 2.0
- Documentation → CC BY 4.0
This repository is an archival reference artifact — stable, verifiable, and citable.
All new runtime development continues in CRI-CORE, which automates AWO’s governance logic.
This repository maintains a cryptographic integrity registry (SHA256SUMS.txt) at the root.
It is automatically rebuilt and committed by the Build root SHA256SUMS workflow.
Scope
- All core documents under
/docs/(whitepaper, spec, guide) - All ADRs under
/decisions/ - Compliance and governance files at root
- Current attested runs under
/runs/
To verify locally:
sha256sum --check SHA256SUMS.txt© 2025 Waveframe Labs · Independent Open-Science Research Entity