Skip to content

ci: Add ubuntu-24.04-arm regular CI and release artifact #2558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ci: Add ubuntu-24.04-arm regular CI and release artifact #2558

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ccc7761
ci: Add ubuntu-24.04-arm regular CI and release artifact
ADKaster Mar 6, 2025
d8259df
ci: Use associative array for release archive osname
ADKaster Mar 6, 2025
907a247
ci: typo :(
ADKaster Mar 6, 2025
42ac3e1
ci: don't forget wasi
ADKaster Mar 6, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions .github/workflows/build.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
strategy:
matrix:
os: [ubuntu-latest, macos-13, macos-latest, windows-latest]
os: [ubuntu-latest, ubuntu-24.04-arm, macos-13, macos-latest, windows-latest]
Copy link
Member

@sbc100 sbc100 Mar 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its kind of unfortunate that this is called -arm and not -arm64 or -aarch64 (which are the two names by which I know this architecture).

Perhaps we can avoid directly using the OS names in artifact names?

For example, can we map ubuntu-20.04 to linux-x64 and ubuntu-24.04-arm to linux-arm64`?

Copy link
Author

@ADKaster ADKaster Mar 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I can't say I understand the naming that GitHub went with. The only thing that might make sense sense is that since these images are "partner images" from some contract they have with ARM Ltd., it was named by a program manager? From a developer standpoint it should really be -arm64 or -aarch64. I'll see if I can come up with a not-awful mapping in the action's yml.

steps:
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
Expand All @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ jobs:
submodules: true
- name: install ninja (linux)
run: sudo apt-get install ninja-build
if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest'
if: startsWith(matrix.os, 'ubuntu-')
- name: install ninja (osx)
run: brew install ninja
if: matrix.os == 'macos-13' || matrix.os == 'macos-latest'
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/build_release.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
strategy:
matrix:
os: [ubuntu-20.04, macos-14, windows-latest]
os: [ubuntu-20.04, ubuntu-24.04-arm, macos-14, windows-latest]
defaults:
run:
shell: bash
Expand Down
Loading