Skip to content

Conversation

gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed changes

Ref: ethereum#32404

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
  • Regular KTLO or any of the maintaince work. e.g code style
  • CICD Improvement

Impacted Components

Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,

Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

@benjamin202410
Copy link
Collaborator

remove WIP if pr is ready to merge

@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title [WIP] ethclient/gethclient: use common.Hash to debug_traceTransaction #32404 ethclient/gethclient: use common.Hash to debug_traceTransaction #32404 Aug 31, 2025
@gzliudan gzliudan force-pushed the gethclient-trace-hash-param branch from 9d2e084 to efaf542 Compare August 31, 2025 07:54
@gzliudan gzliudan merged commit b856f98 into XinFinOrg:dev-upgrade Aug 31, 2025
8 checks passed
@gzliudan gzliudan deleted the gethclient-trace-hash-param branch August 31, 2025 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants