Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade canvas from 2.10.1 to 2.10.2#1

Open
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-upgrade-0ae265cf011fd1c3ffbc7f58e4ca27e6
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade canvas from 2.10.1 to 2.10.2#1
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-upgrade-0ae265cf011fd1c3ffbc7f58e4ca27e6

Conversation

@snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade canvas from 2.10.1 to 2.10.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2022-10-30.
Release notes
Package name: canvas
  • 2.10.2 - 2022-10-30

    Fixed

    • Fix Assertion failed: (object->InternalFieldCount() > 0), function Unwrap, file nan_object_wrap.h, line 32. (#2025)
    • textBaseline and textAlign were not saved/restored by save()/restore(). (#1936)
    • Update nan to v2.17.0 to ensure Node.js v18+ support.

    Changed

    • Improve performance and memory usage of save()/restore().
    • save()/restore() no longer have a maximum depth (previously 64 states).
  • 2.10.1 - 2022-09-07

    Fixed

    • Fix actualBoundingBoxLeft and actualBoundingBoxRight when textAlign='center' or 'right' (#1909)
    • Fix rgba(r,g,b,0) with alpha to 0 should parse as transparent, not opaque. (#2110)
from canvas GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: canvas
  • 672104c v2.10.2
  • cc32159 src: shorten receiver checks
  • ad18c6c src: shorten copy assignment operator decl for Point
  • 2876b6e Bugfix/Node.js 18 -> Assertion failed: (object->InternalFieldCount() > 0) (#2133)
  • 0e6504a remove save() limit, improve save/restore perf, fix some props

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments