Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Testfile (as this is no real test I did not add it to the PR) |
Contributor
|
Hello, are there any updates on this? The fix seems to work and we are waiting for this PR to be evaluated. Would you like to take it out of the draft status or does @jstaerk evaluate it in the draft state as well? Thank you! |
Contributor
Author
|
I‘ll take a look at it tomorrow to see if it needs to be changed for ZUGFeRD and will disable Draft afterwards! |
Contributor
Author
|
Carefully searched through the documentation. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Possible problem:
I'm not quite sure if the top-level Node is always called
<Invoice>. It's called<CrossIndustryInvoice>in ZUGFeRD and the xPath would fail in this case. But leaving the root element out of the xpath would make it find the item level AllowanceCharge also, which is also wrong.