Alt itest vscode improvements

[ZZiigguurraatt]

Trying to find the best combination of options vs lightninglabs#990. Would like some review on this, but github is not showing the diff properly. Here is the correct diff of the file of interest:

$ git diff general_itest_improvements alt_itest_improvements .vscode/launch.json
diff --git a/.vscode/launch.json b/.vscode/launch.json
index 3975819..a03f65e 100644
--- a/.vscode/launch.json
+++ b/.vscode/launch.json
@@ -12,19 +12,21 @@
       "preLaunchTask": "reset before itest",
       "program": "${workspaceFolder}/itest",
       "env": {
-        "CGO_ENABLED": "0",
+              "GOEXPERIMENT": "loopvar",
+              "GO111MODULE": "on"
       },
       "args": [
         "-test.v",
         "-test.run=TestLightningTerminal/test_custom_channels",
-        "-logoutput",
+        "-loglevel=trace",
+        "-btcdexec=./btcd-itest",
         "-logdir=${workspaceFolder}/itest/.logs",
         "-litdexec=${workspaceFolder}/itest/litd-itest",
       ],
       "buildFlags": [
-        "-ldflags=-X github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/build.RawTags=chainrpc,walletrpc,signrpc,invoicesrpc,autopilotrpc,watchtowerrpc,twclientrpc -X github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/build.Commit=lightning-terminal-v0.4.0-alpha -X github.com/lightninglabs/loop.Commit=localbuild -X github.com/lightninglabs/pool.Commit=localbuild -X github.com/lightninglabs/lightning-terminal.Commit=localbuild",
-        "-tags=dev integration itest lowscrypt litd autopilotrpc signrpc walletrpc chainrpc invoicesrpc watchtowerrpc neutrinorpc peersrpc",
+              "-tags=dev integration itest autopilotrpc routerrpc signrpc verrpc walletrpc chainrpc invoicesrpc watchtowerrpc wtclientrpc peersrpc btcd monitoring",
       ],
+      "hideSystemGoroutines": true,
     },
     {
       "name": "Debug Tests",
@@ -47,4 +49,4 @@
       "disableOptimisticBPs": true
     }
   ]
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}

[ZZiigguurraatt]

@gijswijs, would appreciate if you could take a look. github is not allowing me to add you as a reviewer for some reason.