-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Enhance Analysis Module with Detailed Error Detection and Validation #20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
89301f3
fe5474d
299a40f
368b0d8
97157ab
2c40248
d8b0f88
fa02e17
ad22394
034b4d0
e82c99b
f5ec675
7417b17
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ | ||
| # Enhanced Code Analysis Module | ||
|
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The README.md file is comprehensive and well-structured. It provides a clear overview of the module's capabilities and how to use them. The examples are particularly helpful. A few suggestions to enhance it further:
|
||
|
|
||
| This module provides comprehensive code analysis capabilities for Python codebases, focusing on detailed error detection, function call analysis, and type validation. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Features | ||
|
|
||
| ### Error Detection | ||
|
|
||
| The error detection system identifies various issues in your code: | ||
|
|
||
| - **Parameter Validation**: Detects unused parameters, parameter count mismatches, and missing required parameters | ||
| - **Call Validation**: Validates function call-in and call-out points, detects circular dependencies | ||
| - **Return Validation**: Checks for inconsistent return types and values | ||
| - **Code Quality**: Identifies unreachable code, overly complex functions, and potential exceptions | ||
|
|
||
| ### Function Call Analysis | ||
|
|
||
| The function call analysis provides insights into how functions interact: | ||
|
|
||
| - **Call Graph**: Builds a graph of function calls to visualize dependencies | ||
| - **Parameter Usage**: Analyzes how parameters are used within functions | ||
| - **Call Statistics**: Identifies most called functions, entry points, and leaf functions | ||
| - **Call Chains**: Finds paths between functions and calculates call depths | ||
|
|
||
| ### Type Validation | ||
|
|
||
| The type validation system checks for type-related issues: | ||
|
|
||
| - **Type Annotations**: Validates type annotations and identifies missing annotations | ||
| - **Type Compatibility**: Checks for type mismatches and inconsistencies | ||
| - **Type Inference**: Infers types for variables and expressions where possible | ||
|
|
||
| ## Usage | ||
|
|
||
| ### Using the CodeAnalyzer | ||
|
|
||
| ```python | ||
| from codegen import Codebase | ||
| from codegen_on_oss.analysis.analysis import CodeAnalyzer | ||
|
|
||
| # Create a codebase from a repository | ||
| codebase = Codebase.from_repo("owner/repo") | ||
|
|
||
| # Create an analyzer | ||
| analyzer = CodeAnalyzer(codebase) | ||
|
|
||
| # Get comprehensive analysis | ||
| results = analyzer.analyze_all() | ||
|
|
||
| # Access specific analysis components | ||
| error_analysis = analyzer.analyze_errors() | ||
| function_call_analysis = analyzer.analyze_function_calls() | ||
| type_analysis = analyzer.analyze_types() | ||
| complexity_analysis = analyzer.analyze_complexity() | ||
| import_analysis = analyzer.analyze_imports() | ||
|
|
||
| # Get detailed information about specific elements | ||
| function = analyzer.find_function_by_name("my_function") | ||
| call_graph = analyzer.get_function_call_graph() | ||
| callers = call_graph.get_callers("my_function") | ||
| callees = call_graph.get_callees("my_function") | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Using the API | ||
|
|
||
| The module provides a FastAPI-based API for analyzing codebases: | ||
|
|
||
| - `POST /analyze_repo`: Analyze an entire repository | ||
| - `POST /analyze_file`: Analyze a specific file | ||
| - `POST /analyze_function`: Analyze a specific function | ||
| - `POST /analyze_errors`: Get detailed error analysis with optional filtering | ||
|
|
||
| Example request to analyze a repository: | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "repo_url": "owner/repo" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Example request to analyze a specific function: | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "repo_url": "owner/repo", | ||
| "function_name": "my_function" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Error Categories | ||
|
|
||
| The error detection system identifies the following categories of errors: | ||
|
|
||
| - `PARAMETER_TYPE_MISMATCH`: Parameter type doesn't match expected type | ||
| - `PARAMETER_COUNT_MISMATCH`: Wrong number of parameters in function call | ||
| - `UNUSED_PARAMETER`: Parameter is declared but never used | ||
| - `UNDEFINED_PARAMETER`: Parameter is used but not declared | ||
| - `MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER`: Required parameter is missing in function call | ||
| - `RETURN_TYPE_MISMATCH`: Return value type doesn't match declared return type | ||
| - `UNDEFINED_VARIABLE`: Variable is used but not defined | ||
| - `UNUSED_IMPORT`: Import is never used | ||
| - `UNUSED_VARIABLE`: Variable is defined but never used | ||
| - `POTENTIAL_EXCEPTION`: Function might throw an exception without proper handling | ||
| - `CALL_POINT_ERROR`: Error in function call-in or call-out point | ||
| - `CIRCULAR_DEPENDENCY`: Circular dependency between functions | ||
| - `INCONSISTENT_RETURN`: Inconsistent return statements in function | ||
| - `UNREACHABLE_CODE`: Code that will never be executed | ||
| - `COMPLEX_FUNCTION`: Function with high cyclomatic complexity | ||
|
|
||
| ## Extending the Analysis | ||
|
|
||
| You can extend the analysis capabilities by: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Creating new detector classes that inherit from `ErrorDetector` | ||
| 2. Implementing custom analysis logic in the `detect_errors` method | ||
| 3. Adding the new detector to the `CodeAnalysisError` class | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. question (bug_risk): Potential inconsistency in extension instructions. Step 3 refers to adding the detector to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. question: Clarify role of The example omits step 3βs detector registration in |
||
|
|
||
| Example: | ||
|
|
||
| ```python | ||
| from codegen_on_oss.analysis.error_detection import ErrorDetector, ErrorCategory, ErrorSeverity, CodeError | ||
|
|
||
| class MyCustomDetector(ErrorDetector): | ||
| def detect_errors(self) -> List[CodeError]: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. issue (bug_risk): Missing import in extension example. Add |
||
| self.clear_errors() | ||
|
|
||
| # Implement custom detection logic | ||
| for function in self.codebase.functions: | ||
| # Check for issues | ||
| if some_condition: | ||
| self.errors.append(CodeError( | ||
| category=ErrorCategory.COMPLEX_FUNCTION, | ||
| severity=ErrorSeverity.WARNING, | ||
| message="Custom error message", | ||
| file_path=function.filepath, | ||
| function_name=function.name | ||
| )) | ||
|
|
||
| return self.errors | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Future Enhancements | ||
|
|
||
| Planned enhancements for the analysis module: | ||
|
|
||
| - Integration with external linters and type checkers | ||
| - Machine learning-based error detection | ||
| - Interactive visualization of analysis results | ||
| - Performance optimization for large codebases | ||
| - Support for more programming languages | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The README is well-written and provides a comprehensive overview of the new features. However, it would be helpful to add a section on testing these features, including examples of how to write tests for error detection, function call analysis, and type validation. This would encourage good testing practices for users of these features.