Skip to content

Conversation

@codegen-sh
Copy link

@codegen-sh codegen-sh bot commented Dec 26, 2025

🎯 Overview

Automated system to analyze all 956 repositories in the Zeeeepa organization for Enterprise CI/CD compatibility using Codegen agents and Repomix.

🚀 What This Adds

Core Components

  1. mass_repo_analysis.py - Main Python script using Codegen SDK

    • Creates 956 independent agent runs
    • Rate limiting: 30 agents/minute
    • Execution time: ~30 minutes total
  2. create_analysis_agents.sh - Bash alternative using curl

    • Direct API calls for flexibility
    • Same functionality as Python version
  3. ANALYSIS_README.md - Comprehensive documentation

    • Usage instructions
    • Configuration options
    • Troubleshooting guide
  4. repos_list.txt - Repository list template

    • Ready for population with all 956 repo names

📊 Analysis Capabilities

Each repository is analyzed using Repomix and rated on 8 Enterprise CI/CD criteria (1-10 scale):

  1. Build System Maturity - Build config, dependencies
  2. CI/CD Integration Readiness - Automation, deployment
  3. Code Quality & Standards - Linting, formatting, static analysis
  4. Documentation Quality - README, API docs, setup instructions
  5. Containerization - Docker configuration
  6. Testing Infrastructure - Unit, integration tests, coverage
  7. Security Practices - Scanning, vulnerabilities, secrets
  8. Enterprise Compatibility - Licensing, scalability, features

📁 Output Structure

Generates structured ratings for each repo:

ratings/
├── -Linux-.json
├── 1Panel.json
├── 3x-ui.json
└── ...956 files total

Each rating includes:

  • Overall score (average of 8 criteria)
  • Individual criterion ratings
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Actionable recommendations
  • Notable files

🔄 Workflow

graph LR
    A[Fetch 956 Repos] --> B[Create Agent Runs]
    B --> C{Rate Limit}
    C -->|30/min| D[Agent Analyzes Repo]
    D --> E[Uses Repomix]
    E --> F[Rates 8 Criteria]
    F --> G[Generates JSON]
    G --> H[Commits to Branch]
    H --> I{More Repos?}
    I -->|Yes| C
    I -->|No| J[Create PR]
Loading

⚡ Quick Start

# 1. Set API key
export CODEGEN_API_KEY='your-key'

# 2. Populate repos_list.txt with all 956 repo names

# 3. Run analysis
python3 mass_repo_analysis.py

# 4. Wait ~30 minutes for completion

# 5. Create PR from analysis branch

✅ Benefits

  • 🎯 Comprehensive - All 956 repos analyzed
  • Fast - Parallel agent execution (~30 min total)
  • 📊 Objective - Structured 1-10 ratings
  • 💡 Actionable - Specific recommendations
  • 🔄 Automated - No manual intervention needed
  • 📦 Organized - Single branch → one PR

🛠️ Technical Details

  • Rate Limiting: Automatic (30 agents/minute)
  • Agent Orchestration: Codegen SDK + API
  • Code Analysis: Repomix for full codebase inspection
  • Output Format: Structured JSON per repository
  • Branch Strategy: All commits to single analysis branch
  • Error Handling: Failed runs tracked in results file

📝 Next Steps

  1. Merge this PR to add the system
  2. Populate repos_list.txt with all 956 repository names
  3. Run mass_repo_analysis.py to create agent runs
  4. Monitor progress in Codegen dashboard (~30 minutes)
  5. Review generated ratings in analysis branch
  6. Create final PR with all 956 ratings for review

🎉 Impact

This system enables:

  • Quick assessment of entire organization's CI/CD maturity
  • Identification of repositories needing improvement
  • Prioritization of infrastructure investments
  • Tracking of CI/CD adoption over time
  • Benchmarking across all repositories

Ready to analyze 956 repositories in 30 minutes! 🚀


💻 View my work • 👤 Initiated by @ZeeeepaAbout Codegen
⛔ Remove Codegen from PR🚫 Ban action checks


Summary by cubic

Adds an automated system to analyze all 956 Zeeeepa repositories for CI/CD readiness using Codegen agents and Repomix. It creates rate‑limited agent runs, generates per‑repo JSON ratings, and pushes results to a single analysis branch.

  • New Features

    • mass_repo_analysis.py: orchestrates agent runs (30/min), uses Repomix, writes ratings/.json, commits to a dedicated branch.
    • create_analysis_agents.sh: curl-based alternative with the same flow and rate limiting.
    • ANALYSIS_README.md: usage, configuration, and troubleshooting.
    • repos_list.txt: template for repository names; analysis outputs 8 criteria scores with recommendations per repo.
  • Migration

    • Set CODEGEN_API_KEY.
    • Populate repos_list.txt with all repo names.
    • Run the Python script (or Bash), monitor runs (~30 min), then create a PR from the analysis branch.

Written for commit 540ceed. Summary will update automatically on new commits.

- Creates 956 agent runs for comprehensive Repomix-based analysis
- Analyzes all Zeeeepa org repos for Enterprise CI/CD compatibility
- Rates each repo on 8 criteria (Build, CI/CD, Quality, Docs, Docker, Tests, Security, Enterprise)
- Automatic rate limiting (30 agents/min)
- All ratings committed to single branch → one PR
- Comprehensive documentation and usage instructions

Execution time: ~30 minutes for 956 repositories
Output: ratings/<repo-name>.json for each repository

Co-authored-by: Zeeeepa <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 issues found across 4 files

Prompt for AI agents (all issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.


<file name="create_analysis_agents.sh">

<violation number="1" location="create_analysis_agents.sh:153">
P2: JSON array construction produces invalid JSON when the last repository (or trailing repos) fail. The comma is added based on INDEX position, not on whether this is actually the last successful entry. Consider tracking successful entries separately or building the JSON differently.</violation>
</file>

<file name="mass_repo_analysis.py">

<violation number="1" location="mass_repo_analysis.py:159">
P2: `datetime.utcnow()` is deprecated since Python 3.12. Use `datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc)` instead. This pattern also appears on lines 207 and 234.</violation>
</file>

Reply to cubic to teach it or ask questions. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.


# Save to results
echo "$BODY" | jq -c ". + {repo_name: \"$REPO_NAME\"}" >> "$RESULTS_FILE"
if [ $INDEX -lt $TOTAL_REPOS ]; then
Copy link

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot Dec 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: JSON array construction produces invalid JSON when the last repository (or trailing repos) fail. The comma is added based on INDEX position, not on whether this is actually the last successful entry. Consider tracking successful entries separately or building the JSON differently.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At create_analysis_agents.sh, line 153:

<comment>JSON array construction produces invalid JSON when the last repository (or trailing repos) fail. The comma is added based on INDEX position, not on whether this is actually the last successful entry. Consider tracking successful entries separately or building the JSON differently.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+        
+        # Save to results
+        echo &quot;$BODY&quot; | jq -c &quot;. + {repo_name: \&quot;$REPO_NAME\&quot;}&quot; &gt;&gt; &quot;$RESULTS_FILE&quot;
+        if [ $INDEX -lt $TOTAL_REPOS ]; then
+            echo &quot;,&quot; &gt;&gt; &quot;$RESULTS_FILE&quot;
+        fi
</file context>
Fix with Cubic

"success": True,
"run_id": run.id,
"repo": repo_name,
"created_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat()
Copy link

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot Dec 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: datetime.utcnow() is deprecated since Python 3.12. Use datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc) instead. This pattern also appears on lines 207 and 234.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At mass_repo_analysis.py, line 159:

<comment>`datetime.utcnow()` is deprecated since Python 3.12. Use `datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc)` instead. This pattern also appears on lines 207 and 234.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+            &quot;success&quot;: True,
+            &quot;run_id&quot;: run.id,
+            &quot;repo&quot;: repo_name,
+            &quot;created_at&quot;: datetime.utcnow().isoformat()
+        }
+    
</file context>
Fix with Cubic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants