Skip to content

Conversation

@vil02
Copy link
Contributor

@vil02 vil02 commented Nov 18, 2025

This is makes the code less dependent on transitive includes.

Since the change is quite big, I decided to cut it into smaller pieces. This PR addresses all of the standard headers. I am planning to create another PR with CXXGraph headers only.

@vil02 vil02 force-pushed the add_missing_std_includes branch 3 times, most recently from a206cc1 to abef4ac Compare November 18, 2025 22:17
This is makes the code less dependent on transitive includes.
@vil02 vil02 force-pushed the add_missing_std_includes branch from abef4ac to 1c87bae Compare November 18, 2025 22:21
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.03%. Comparing base (200d838) to head (1c87bae).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #560      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.07%   97.03%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          98       98              
  Lines       11291    11291              
  Branches      796      796              
==========================================
- Hits        10961    10956       -5     
- Misses        330      335       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.03% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vil02 vil02 marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 22:30
@ZigRazor ZigRazor merged commit 6cebb63 into ZigRazor:master Nov 20, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@vil02 vil02 deleted the add_missing_std_includes branch November 20, 2025 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants