feat(spec): add file_with_text field to FilePart for text-based formats

[matoushavlena]

Adds file_with_text field to FilePart to enable sending text-based file formats without unnecessary base64 encoding.

Fully backward compatible. Existing file_with_bytes and file_with_uri continue to work unchanged.

Resolves #1255

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @matoushavlena, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to the FilePart specification by adding a file_with_text field. This allows for more efficient handling of text-based file formats by enabling their direct transmission as plain text, thereby eliminating the overhead of unnecessary base64 encoding. The update maintains full backward compatibility and is thoroughly documented across the project's specification files.

Highlights

• New file_with_text field: A new file_with_text field has been introduced within the FilePart message in the a2a.proto specification.
• Optimized text file handling: This new field enables the direct transmission of text-based file formats (e.g., HTML, XML, JSON) without the need for base64 encoding, improving efficiency and reducing overhead.
• Documentation updates: The official documentation, including llms.txt, specification.md, and key-concepts.md, has been updated to reflect and explain the new file_with_text option and its usage.
• Backward compatibility: The change is fully backward compatible, ensuring existing file_with_bytes and file_with_uri functionalities remain unchanged.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a file_with_text field to FilePart to enable sending text-based file formats more efficiently by avoiding unnecessary base64 encoding. The changes are consistently applied across the protocol definition and documentation, and the feature is fully backward compatible. My review includes one minor suggestion to clarify in the protocol definition that the content for file_with_text must be a valid UTF-8 string, as this is a requirement for protobuf string types and is important for implementers to know. Overall, this is a well-implemented and useful feature.

[gemini-code-assist]

Since protobuf string types must be valid UTF-8, it's important to clarify this constraint for implementers. For text files with encodings other than UTF-8, file_with_bytes should be used. Please consider adding a note about the UTF-8 requirement.

Suggested change

	// The plain text content of the file (for text-based file formats).
	// The plain text content of the file (for text-based file formats). The content MUST be valid UTF-8.

[geneknit]

/vote

[git-vote]

Vote created

@geneknit has called for a vote on feat(spec): add file_with_text field to FilePart for text-based formats (#1298).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@a2aproject/a2a-tsc

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor	Against	Abstain
👍	👎	👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 11months 29days 3h 50m 24s. It will pass if at least 51% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	6

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@ToddSegal	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	6

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@ToddSegal	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	6

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@ToddSegal	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	6

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@ToddSegal	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	6

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@ToddSegal	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	6

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@ToddSegal	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	5

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@SivaNSAP	Pending

[darrelmiller]

Closing this as there is a new proposal that addresses this requirement in #1255

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 44.44% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
4	0	0	5

Binding votes (4)

User	Vote	Timestamp
SivaNSAP	In favor	2026-01-13 16:13:07.0 +00:00:00
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@lerhaupt	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@spetschulatSFDC	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 50.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
4	0	0	4

Binding votes (4)

User	Vote	Timestamp
SivaNSAP	In favor	2026-01-13 16:13:07.0 +00:00:00
ToddSegal	In favor	2025-12-16 22:12:55.0 +00:00:00
geneknit	In favor	2025-12-10 17:22:25.0 +00:00:00
muscariello	In favor	2025-12-11 9:42:48.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller	Pending
@hughesthe1st	Pending
@000-000-000-000-000	Pending
@spetschulatSFDC	Pending

[amye]

/cancel-vote

Moving to #1255 to keep this clean

[git-vote]

Vote cancelled

@amye has cancelled the vote in progress in this pull request.