fix: change AgentCard's Security prop type to comply a2a spec#155
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @bhakimiy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the AgentCard model to align its Security property with the A2A specification. The change involves modifying the data type of the Security property from a dictionary to a list of dictionaries, which is a crucial step for ensuring data compatibility and correct interpretation of security requirements as per the specification. Accompanying unit tests have been updated to reflect this structural change, ensuring that serialization and deserialization of AgentCard objects continue to function as expected with the new type definition.
Highlights
- Model Type Change: The
Securityproperty within theAgentCardmodel has been updated from aDictionary<string, string[]>?to aList<Dictionary<string, string[]>>?. This change ensures compliance with the A2A specification, which likely mandates thesecurityfield to be an array of security schemes rather than a single object. - Unit Test Updates: Corresponding unit tests in
AgentCardTests.cshave been modified to reflect the newSecurityproperty type. This includes updating the JSON payload used for deserialization, adjusting the way theSecurityproperty is initialized for serialization, and modifying assertions to correctly validate the structure of theSecuritylist.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly updates the Security property in AgentCard to a List<Dictionary<string, string[]>>? to comply with the A2A specification. The changes are consistently applied across the model and its unit tests, including test data and assertions. The implementation is solid, and I have one minor suggestion to improve test code readability.
Blackhex
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM (I agree with the Gemini comment).
Fixes #151