Skip to content

Comments

fix: change AgentCard's Security prop type to comply a2a spec#155

Merged
brandonh-msft merged 2 commits intoa2aproject:mainfrom
bhakimiy:fix/151-issue-with-agent-card-serialization
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

fix: change AgentCard's Security prop type to comply a2a spec#155
brandonh-msft merged 2 commits intoa2aproject:mainfrom
bhakimiy:fix/151-issue-with-agent-card-serialization

Conversation

@bhakimiy
Copy link
Contributor

@bhakimiy bhakimiy commented Aug 19, 2025

Fixes #151

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @bhakimiy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the AgentCard model to align its Security property with the A2A specification. The change involves modifying the data type of the Security property from a dictionary to a list of dictionaries, which is a crucial step for ensuring data compatibility and correct interpretation of security requirements as per the specification. Accompanying unit tests have been updated to reflect this structural change, ensuring that serialization and deserialization of AgentCard objects continue to function as expected with the new type definition.

Highlights

  • Model Type Change: The Security property within the AgentCard model has been updated from a Dictionary<string, string[]>? to a List<Dictionary<string, string[]>>?. This change ensures compliance with the A2A specification, which likely mandates the security field to be an array of security schemes rather than a single object.
  • Unit Test Updates: Corresponding unit tests in AgentCardTests.cs have been modified to reflect the new Security property type. This includes updating the JSON payload used for deserialization, adjusting the way the Security property is initialized for serialization, and modifying assertions to correctly validate the structure of the Security list.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates the Security property in AgentCard to a List<Dictionary<string, string[]>>? to comply with the A2A specification. The changes are consistently applied across the model and its unit tests, including test data and assertions. The implementation is solid, and I have one minor suggestion to improve test code readability.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Blackhex Blackhex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (I agree with the Gemini comment).

@bhakimiy bhakimiy changed the title change AgentCard's Security prop type to comply a2a spec fix: change AgentCard's Security prop type to comply a2a spec Aug 19, 2025
@brandonh-msft brandonh-msft added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into a2aproject:main with commit 287c5c7 Aug 26, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue with AgentCard serialization

4 participants