Skip to content

Conversation

@kabir
Copy link
Collaborator

@kabir kabir commented Jul 3, 2025

Description

Thank you for opening a Pull Request!
Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Follow the CONTRIBUTING Guide.
  • Make your Pull Request title in the https://www.conventionalcommits.org/ specification.
    • Important Prefixes for release-please:
      • fix: which represents bug fixes, and correlates to a SemVer patch.
      • feat: represents a new feature, and correlates to a SemVer minor.
      • feat!:, or fix!:, refactor!:, etc., which represent a breaking change (indicated by the !) and will result in a SemVer major.
  • Ensure the tests pass
  • Appropriate READMEs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @kabir, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request improves the readability and maintainability of the DefaultRequestHandler by adding crucial inline documentation. The new comments highlight a specific dependency in the execution flow, ensuring future developers understand why the done callback must be registered before event consumption begins to guarantee proper error handling.

Highlights

  • Code Clarity: Added clarifying comments in DefaultRequestHandler.java to explain the critical ordering requirement for adding a done callback to producerRunnable before initiating event consumption. This ensures that any errors thrown by the producer are correctly picked up by the consumer.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds comments to clarify the order of operations between adding a doneCallback to a producer and starting a consumer. The comments are helpful, but the API design could be improved to prevent potential race conditions by construction.

Comment on lines +166 to +167
// This callback must be added before we start consuming. Otherwise,
// any errors thrown by the producerRunnable are not picked up by the consumer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The comment clarifies the order of operations, but the API could be refactored to enforce this order, preventing potential race conditions. Consider modifying ResultAggregator.consumeAndBreakOnInterrupt to accept the producerRunnable as a parameter to encapsulate the logic of adding the callback before consumption.

Comment on lines +210 to +211
// This callback must be added before we start consuming. Otherwise,
// any errors thrown by the producerRunnable are not picked up by the consumer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to the previous comment, consider refactoring ResultAggregator.consumeAndEmit to accept the producerRunnable to prevent potential race conditions by design.

@fjuma fjuma merged commit 982138c into a2aproject:main Jul 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@kabir kabir deleted the tck-failure branch July 4, 2025 11:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants