fix: Send push notifications for message/send #298
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kthota-g, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a critical bug preventing push notifications from being sent for message/send operations that initiate a new task rather than operating on an existing one. The core change involves refactoring the placement of push notification configuration storage to ensure it consistently occurs once a task_id is available, thereby guaranteeing notifications are triggered as expected. This also centralizes the configuration logic and is backed by a new dedicated test.
Highlights
- Bug Fix: Push Notifications: Resolved an issue where push notifications were not being triggered for
message/sendoperations when no initial task was present. Previously, the push notification configuration was only set if a task already existed or was updated, missing scenarios where a new task was implicitly created. - Code Relocation & Centralization: The logic for storing push notification configuration (
_push_config_store.set_info) has been moved within_setup_message_executionto ensure it always uses the establishedtask_idafter it's determined, regardless of whether a task was pre-existing or newly assigned. This change centralizes the configuration setup. - Redundant Logic Removal: A redundant block of code that set push notification information within
on_message_send_streamhas been removed, as this responsibility is now handled consistently and earlier in the_setup_message_executionfunction. - Test Coverage: A new test case,
test_on_message_send_with_push_notification_no_existing_Task, has been added to specifically validate that push notification information is correctly set for newly created tasks, ensuring the bug fix is verified.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request moves push notification setup logic to a common setup function, ensuring notifications are sent for message/send operations that initiate a new task. A new test case validates the fix. The review suggests replacing assert statements with if/raise blocks for robustness.
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.2.12](v0.2.11...v0.2.12) (2025-07-14) ### Features * add `metadata` property to `RequestContext` ([#302](#302)) ([e781ced](e781ced)) * add A2ABaseModel ([#292](#292)) ([24f2eb0](24f2eb0)) * add support for notification tokens in PushNotificationSender ([#266](#266)) ([75aa4ed](75aa4ed)) * Update A2A types from specification 🤖 ([#289](#289)) ([ecb321a](ecb321a)) ### Bug Fixes * add proper a2a request body documentation to Swagger UI ([#276](#276)) ([4343be9](4343be9)), closes [#274](#274) * Handle asyncio.cancellederror and raise to propagate back ([#293](#293)) ([9d6cb68](9d6cb68)) * Improve error handling in task creation ([#294](#294)) ([6412c75](6412c75)) * Resolve dependency issue with sql stores ([#303](#303)) ([2126828](2126828)) * Send push notifications for message/send ([#298](#298)) ([0274112](0274112)) * **server:** Improve event consumer error handling ([#282](#282)) ([a5786a1](a5786a1)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
Push notifications are not being triggered for message/send operations without an initial task.