sycl-ls working #2

aarongreig · 2024-04-02T09:58:06Z

No description provided.

…e exception specification of a function (#90760) [temp.deduct.general] p6 states: > At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template arguments. This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default arguments are substituted. [temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say: > The _deduction substitution loci_ are > - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_, > - the explicit-specifier, > - the template parameter declarations, and > - the template argument list of a partial specialization > > The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in the deduction substitution loci. [...] Consider the following: ```cpp struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1 template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2 template<> void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject ``` Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate being ignored. This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the _noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated. As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the instantiation of the exception specification of a function template specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per [except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).

…ined member functions & member function templates (#88963) Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector: ``` template<typename T> concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long); template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function template<> void f(char); // intel#3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function }; template<> template<typename U> void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // intel#4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template template<> template<> void A<int>::f(int); // intel#5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template<> void A<long>::g(); // intel#6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function ``` A number of problems exist: - Clang rejects `intel#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U` substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated function template. - Clang rejects `intel#5` because the function template specialization instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `intel#5` does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function). - Clang rejects `intel#6` for the same reasons it rejects `intel#5`. This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes: - To fix `intel#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed `FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_ of `intel#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`. - To fix `intel#5` and `intel#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared for explicit specializations that declare functions. In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we previously would select the first function that has the same type as the explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we match EDG's behavior for these declarations.

...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > intel#3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > intel#4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > intel#5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > intel#6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (intel#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]>

…ication as used during partial ordering (#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).

…erSize (#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 intel#3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 intel#4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 intel#5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 intel#6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```

…0820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses: 1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the compute constructs however. 2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a 'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though we do. 3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet the requirements of #2. This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.

… (#92855) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional wording introduced in llvm/llvm-project#89807 so it also covers deduction of class templates. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again. This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid: ```C++ template<class T, class U> struct A {}; A<int, float> v; template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>); // OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter. void g() { f(v); } ``` --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…linux (#99613) Examples of the output: ARM: ``` # ./a.out AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0) ==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==122==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x76e13ac0 (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) #1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680) #2 0x005c2250 (/root/a.out+0x145250) intel#3 0x76db982c (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c) intel#4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918) ==122==Register values: r0 = 0x00000000 r1 = 0x0000007a r2 = 0x0000000b r3 = 0x76d95020 r4 = 0x0000007a r5 = 0x00000001 r6 = 0x005dcc5c r7 = 0x0000010c r8 = 0x0000000b r9 = 0x76f9ece0 r10 = 0x00000000 r11 = 0x7eb7fd00 r12 = 0x76dce670 sp = 0x7eb7fcc8 lr = 0x76e13ab4 pc = 0x76e13ac0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) ==122==ABORTING ``` AArch64: ``` # ./a.out UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99) ==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access. ==99==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x007fbbbc5860 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) #1 0x007fbbb81578 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578) #2 0x00556051152c (/root/a.out+0x3152c) intel#3 0x007fbbb6e268 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268) intel#4 0x007fbbb6e344 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344) intel#5 0x0055604e45ec (/root/a.out+0x45ec) ==99==Register values: x0 = 0x0000000000000000 x1 = 0x0000000000000063 x2 = 0x000000000000000b x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440 x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580 x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce x6 = 0x0000000000000000 x7 = 0x00000055605110b0 x8 = 0x0000000000000083 x9 = 0x0000000000000000 x10 = 0x0000000000000000 x11 = 0x0000000000000000 x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360 x13 = 0x0000000000010000 x14 = 0x0000000000000039 x15 = 0x00000000004113a0 x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560 x17 = 0x0000005560540138 x18 = 0x000000006474e552 x19 = 0x0000000000000063 x20 = 0x0000000000000001 x21 = 0x000000000000000b x22 = 0x0000005560511510 x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918 x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50 x25 = 0x0000000000000000 x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000 x27 = 0x000000556053f858 x28 = 0x0000000000000000 fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) ==99==ABORTING ```

…104148) `hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any binding it sets are available to the second matcher. Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2 matches): ```bash > cat tmp.cpp int a = 13; int b = ((int) a) - a; int c = a - ((int) a); > clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here int a = 13; ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here int b = ((int)a) - a; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 match. > ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here 2 | int b = ((int)a) - a; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Match #2: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here 3 | int c = a - ((int)a); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 matches. ``` If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me know where.

Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame intel#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame intel#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame intel#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame intel#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame intel#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame intel#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame intel#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame intel#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame intel#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```

Currently, process of replacing bitwise operations consisting of `LSR`/`LSL` with `And` is performed by `DAGCombiner`. However, in certain cases, the `AND` generated by this process can be removed. Consider following case: ``` lsr x8, x8, intel#56 and x8, x8, #0xfc ldr w0, [x2, x8] ret ``` In this case, we can remove the `AND` by changing the target of `LDR` to `[X2, X8, LSL #2]` and right-shifting amount change to 56 to 58. after changed: ``` lsr x8, x8, intel#58 ldr w0, [x2, x8, lsl #2] ret ``` This patch checks to see if the `SHIFTING` + `AND` operation on load target can be optimized and optimizes it if it can.

`JITDylibSearchOrderResolver` local variable can be destroyed before completion of all callbacks. Capture it together with `Deps` in `OnEmitted` callback. Original error: ``` ==2035==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7bebfa155b70 at pc 0x7ff2a9a88b4a bp 0x7bec08d51980 sp 0x7bec08d51978 READ of size 8 at 0x7bebfa155b70 thread T87 (tf_xla-cpu-llvm) #0 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:58 #1 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __invoke<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:149:25 #2 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __call<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:224:5 intel#3 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:210:12 intel#4 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in void std::__u::__function::__policy_invoker<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, ```

Static destructor can race with calls to notify and trigger tsan warning. ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=5787) Write of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T23: #0 pthread_mutex_destroy [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1344](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1344&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12affb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_destroy [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:91](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=91&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::~recursive_mutex() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:52](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=52&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) intel#3 ~SmartMutex [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:28](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=28&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) intel#4 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::~PerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:65](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=65&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) intel#5 cxa_at_exit_callback_installed_at(void*) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:437](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=437&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b172cb9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) intel#6 llvm::JITEventListener::createPerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:496](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=496&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcad8f5) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) ``` ``` Previous atomic read of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T192 (mutexes: write M0, write M1): #0 pthread_mutex_unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1387](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1387&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12b6bb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_unlock [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:87](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=87&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::unlock() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:64](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=64&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) intel#3 unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:47](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=47&cl=669089572):16 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) intel#4 ~lock_guard [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h:39](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h?l=39&cl=669089572):101 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) intel#5 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::notifyObjectLoaded(unsigned long, llvm::object::ObjectFile const&, llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo const&) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:290](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=290&cl=669089572):1 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) intel#6 llvm::orc::RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::onObjEmit(llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility&, llvm::object::OwningBinary<llvm::object::ObjectFile>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>>>, llvm::Error) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:386](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp?l=386&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bc404a8) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) ```

When SPARC Asan testing is enabled by PR #107405, many Linux/sparc64 tests just hang like ``` #0 0xf7ae8e90 in syscall () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 #1 0x701065e8 in __sanitizer::FutexWait(__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t*, unsigned int) () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp:766 #2 0x70107c90 in Wait () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35 intel#3 0x700f7cac in Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:196 intel#4 Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_registry.h:98 intel#5 LockThreads () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_thread.cpp:489 intel#6 0x700e9c8c in __asan::BeforeFork() () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_posix.cpp:157 intel#7 0xf7ac83f4 in ?? () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) ``` It turns out that this happens in tests using `internal_fork` (e.g. invoking `llvm-symbolizer`): unlike most other Linux targets, which use `clone`, Linux/sparc64 has to use `__fork` instead. While `clone` doesn't trigger `pthread_atfork` handlers, `__fork` obviously does, causing the hang. To avoid this, this patch disables `InstallAtForkHandler` and lets the ASan tests run to completion. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu`.

…ap (#108825) This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328

This reverts commit a89e016. This is being reverted because it broke the test: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test:21:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input CHECK: frame #2: {{.*}}`main

…6386) The overloads for single_task and parallel_for in the sycl_ext_oneapi_kernel_properties extension are being deprecated as mentioned in intel#14785. So I'm rewriting tests containg such overloads so that they can still run after the deprecation. --------- Signed-off-by: Hu, Peisen <[email protected]>

…" (#123877) Reverts llvm/llvm-project#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g., https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio ASan output from local re-run: ``` ==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8 READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0 #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344 #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9 #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42 intel#3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40 intel#4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3 intel#5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15 intel#6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3 intel#7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15 intel#8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12 intel#9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15 intel#10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12 intel#11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12 intel#12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3 intel#13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14 intel#14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14 intel#15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10 intel#16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 intel#17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3 intel#18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60) ```

No codegen regression on either target. The two builtin_ffs implied on nvptx CSE away. ``` define internal i64 @__gpu_read_first_lane_u64(i64 noundef %__lane_mask, i64 noundef %__x) #2 { entry: %shr = lshr i64 %__x, 32 %conv = trunc nuw i64 %shr to i32 %conv1 = trunc i64 %__x to i32 %conv2 = trunc i64 %__lane_mask to i32 %0 = tail call range(i32 0, 33) i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %conv2, i1 true) %iszero = icmp eq i32 %conv2, 0 %sub = select i1 %iszero, i32 -1, i32 %0 %1 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv2, i32 %conv, i32 %sub, i32 31) %conv4 = sext i32 %1 to i64 %shl = shl nsw i64 %conv4, 32 %2 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv2, i32 %conv1, i32 %sub, i32 31) %conv7 = zext i32 %2 to i64 %or = or disjoint i64 %shl, %conv7 ret i64 %or } ; becomes define internal i64 @__gpu_competing_read_first_lane_u64(i64 noundef %__lane_mask, i64 noundef %__x) #2 { entry: %shr = lshr i64 %__x, 32 %conv = trunc nuw i64 %shr to i32 %conv1 = trunc i64 %__x to i32 %conv.i = trunc i64 %__lane_mask to i32 %0 = tail call range(i32 0, 33) i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %conv.i, i1 true) %iszero = icmp eq i32 %conv.i, 0 %sub.i = select i1 %iszero, i32 -1, i32 %0 %1 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv.i, i32 %conv, i32 %sub.i, i32 31) %conv4 = zext i32 %1 to i64 %shl = shl nuw i64 %conv4, 32 %2 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv.i, i32 %conv1, i32 %sub.i, i32 31) %conv7 = zext i32 %2 to i64 %or = or disjoint i64 %shl, %conv7 ret i64 %or } ``` The sext vs zext difference is vaguely interesting but since the bits are immediately discarded in either case it make no odds. The amdgcn one doesn't need CSE, the readfirstlane function is a single call to an intrinsic. Drive by fix to __gpu_match_all_u32, it was calling first_lane_u64 and could use first_lane_u32 instead. Added the missing call to gpuintrin.c test case and a stray missing static as well.

@sarnex

…130) This should fix failures caused by llvm/llvm-project#133967 Attn: @sarnex Thanks Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>

…d A520 (#132246) Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, intel#8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, intel#32 add x11, x11, intel#32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, intel#32 ``` Which is more efficient.

… A510/A520 (#134606) Recommit. This work was done by #132246 but failed buildbots due to the test introduced needing updates Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, intel#8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, intel#32 add x11, x11, intel#32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, intel#32 ``` Which is more efficient.

…e (#138091) Check this error for more context (https://github.com/compiler-research/CppInterOp/actions/runs/14749797085/job/41407625681?pr=491#step:10:531) This fails with ``` * thread #1, name = 'CppInterOpTests', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: address not mapped to object (fault address: 0x55500356d6d3) * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99 frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830 frame #2: 0x00007fffee20917a libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitstd::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() + 58 frame intel#3: 0x00007fffee224796 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 838 frame intel#4: 0x00007fffee22494d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 13 frame intel#5: 0x00007fffed95ec62 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::~IncrementalCUDADeviceParser() + 98 frame intel#6: 0x00007fffed9551b6 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 102 frame intel#7: 0x00007fffed95598d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 13 frame intel#8: 0x00007fffed9181e7 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitcompat::createClangInterpreter(std::vector<char const*, std::allocator<char const*>>&) + 2919 ``` Problem : 1) The destructor currently handles no clearance for the DeviceParser and the DeviceAct. We currently only have this https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/976493822443c52a71ed3c67aaca9a555b20c55d/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp#L416-L419 2) The ownership for DeviceCI currently is present in IncrementalCudaDeviceParser. But this should be similar to how the combination for hostCI, hostAction and hostParser are managed by the Interpreter. As on master the DeviceAct and DeviceParser are managed by the Interpreter but not DeviceCI. This is problematic because : IncrementalParser holds a Sema& which points into the DeviceCI. On master, DeviceCI is destroyed before the base class ~IncrementalParser() runs, causing Parser::reset() to access a dangling Sema (and as Sema holds a reference to Preprocessor which owns PragmaNamespace) we see this ``` * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99 frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830 ```

… `getForwardSlice` matchers (#115670) Improve mlir-query tool by implementing `getBackwardSlice` and `getForwardSlice` matchers. As an addition `SetQuery` also needed to be added to enable custom configuration for each query. e.g: `inclusive`, `omitUsesFromAbove`, `omitBlockArguments`. Note: backwardSlice and forwardSlice algoritms are the same as the ones in `mlir/lib/Analysis/SliceAnalysis.cpp` Example of current matcher. The query was made to the file: `mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir` ```mlir ./mlir-query /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir -c "match getDefinitions(hasOpName(\"arith.add f\"),2)" Match #1: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:5:8: %0 = linalg.generic {indexing_maps = [#map, #map], iterator_types = ["parallel", "parallel"]} ins(%arg0 : tensor<5x5xf32>) outs(%arg1 : tensor<5x5xf32>) { ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:7:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %in, %in : f32 ^ Match #2: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:10:16: %collapsed = tensor.collapse_shape %0 [[0, 1]] : tensor<5x5xf32> into tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:13:11: %c2 = arith.constant 2 : index ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:14:18: %extracted = tensor.extract %collapsed[%c2] : tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:15:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %extracted, %extracted : f32 ^ 2 matches. ```

Fixes #123300 What is seen ``` clang-repl> int x = 42; clang-repl> auto capture = [&]() { return x * 2; }; In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_4:1:17: error: non-local lambda expression cannot have a capture-default 1 | auto capture = [&]() { return x * 2; }; | ^ zsh: segmentation fault clang-repl --Xcc="-v" (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x8) * frame #0: 0x0000000107b4f8b8 libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::IncrementalParser::CleanUpPTU(clang::PartialTranslationUnit&) + 988 frame #1: 0x0000000107b4f1b4 libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::IncrementalParser::ParseOrWrapTopLevelDecl() + 416 frame #2: 0x0000000107b4fb94 libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef) + 612 frame intel#3: 0x0000000107b52fec libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::Interpreter::ParseAndExecute(llvm::StringRef, clang::Value*) + 180 frame intel#4: 0x0000000100003498 clang-repl`main + 3560 frame intel#5: 0x000000018d39a0e0 dyld`start + 2360 ``` Though the error is justified, we shouldn't be interested in exiting through a segfault in such cases. The issue is that empty named decls weren't being taken care of resulting into this assert https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/c1a229252617ed58f943bf3f4698bd8204ee0f04/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclarationName.h#L503 Can also be seen when the example is attempted through xeus-cpp-lite. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b0e6ead-138e-4b06-9ad9-fcb9f8d5bf6e)

With non -O0, the call stack is not preserved, like malloc_shared will be inlined, the call stack would be like ``` #0 in int* sycl::_V1::malloc_host<int>(unsigned long, sycl::_V1::context const&, sycl::_V1::property_list const&, sycl::_V1::detail::code_location const&) /tmp/syclws/include/sycl/usm.hpp:215:27 #1 in ?? (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x757867a2a1c9) #2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x757867a2a28a) ``` instead of ``` #0 in int* sycl::_V1::malloc_host<int>(unsigned long, sycl::_V1::context const&, sycl::_V1::property_list const&, sycl::_V1::detail::code_location const&) /tmp/syclws/include/sycl/usm.hpp:215:27 #1 in int* sycl::_V1::malloc_host<int>(unsigned long, sycl::_V1::queue const&, sycl::_V1::property_list const&, sycl::_V1::detail::code_location const&) /tmp/syclws/include/sycl/usm.hpp:223:10 #2 in main /tmp/syclws/llvm/sycl/test-e2e/MemorySanitizer/track-origins/check_host_usm_initialized_on_host.cpp:15:17 intel#3 in ?? (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x7a67f842a1c9) intel#4 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x7a67f842a28a) ``` Also, add env to every %{run} directive to make sure they are not affected by system env.

aarongreig force-pushed the aaron/pi2ur branch 7 times, most recently from 75d5e97 to 4839a44 Compare April 2, 2024 15:45

aarongreig added 3 commits April 3, 2024 14:52

UR port cmake basics

6cd6317

UR port plugin first pass

263d128

UR port platform/device to get sycl-ls working

042a19e

aarongreig force-pushed the aaron/pi2ur branch from 4839a44 to 042a19e Compare April 3, 2024 14:01

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

sycl-ls working #2

sycl-ls working #2

Uh oh!

aarongreig commented Apr 2, 2024

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

sycl-ls working #2

Are you sure you want to change the base?

sycl-ls working #2

Uh oh!

Conversation

aarongreig commented Apr 2, 2024

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants