Skip to content

Conversation

@abravalheri
Copy link
Owner

This is an investigation on the suggestion in TheKevJames/coveralls-python#434 (comment).

@henryiii henryiii force-pushed the workaround-coveralls-2 branch from b65ae50 to 16a2eaa Compare March 12, 2025 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants