Allow fitting algorithms to use prefitted tracks

[stephenswat]

This commit enables our fitting algorithms to use prefitted tracks, such that we can reuse the fitting information from the CKF. Note that we also preserve the ability to work with unfitted tracks.

[stephenswat]

Depends on #1068.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
15 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
13.9% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[stephenswat]

Physics performance summary

Here is a summary of the physics performance effects of this PR. Command used:

traccc_seeding_example_cuda --input-directory=/data/Acts/odd-simulations-20240506/geant4_ttbar_mu200 --digitization-file=geometries/odd/odd-digi-geometric-config.json --detector-file=geometries/odd/odd-detray_geometry_detray.json --grid-file=geometries/odd/odd-detray_surface_grids_detray.json --material-file=geometries/odd/odd-detray_material_detray.json --input-events=10 --use-acts-geom-source=on --check-performance --truth-finding-min-track-candidates=5 --truth-finding-min-pt=1.0 --truth-finding-min-z=-150 --truth-finding-max-z=150 --truth-finding-max-r=10 --seed-matching-ratio=0.99 --track-matching-ratio=0.5 --track-candidates-range=5:100 --seedfinder-vertex-range=-150:150

Seeding performance

Total number of seeds went from 298342 to 298340 (-0.0%)

Seeding plots

Track finding performance

Total number of found tracks went from 101335 to 101334 (-0.0%)

Finding plots

Track fitting performance

Total number of fitted tracks went from 101335 to 101334 (-0.0%)

Fitting plots

Note

This is an automated message produced on the explicit request of a human being.

[beomki-yeo]

Probably we can do better review after #1068 is merged as the current change is pretty massive.
Meanwhile, could you explain how this PR saves the list of sensitive and passive surfaces passed during the CKF, which should be used in the backward fitting?

[stephenswat]

Meanwhile, could you explain how this PR saves the list of sensitive and passive surfaces passed during the CKF, which should be used in the backward fitting?

I'm still working on this, but I'll have a prototype soon!

[stephenswat]

Closing in favour of #1149.