feat: add temporary API to replace enabled/disabled lists

[tathagat2241]

Changes

• Add PUT /configurations/latest/handlers/:handlerType/replace-enabled-disabled endpoint
• Add replaceHandlerEnabledDisabled controller method
• Update tests to include new method and route
• Update package-lock.json with new dependency

API Details

Endpoint: PUT /configurations/latest/handlers/:handlerType/replace-enabled-disabled

**Request Body:**n
{
"enabled": {
"sites": ["site-id-1", "site-id-2"],
"orgs": ["org-id-1"]
},
"disabled": {
"sites": ["site-id-3"],
"orgs": ["org-id-2"]
}
}

Please ensure your pull request adheres to the following guidelines:

• make sure to link the related issues in this description. Or if there's no issue created, make sure you
  describe here the problem you're solving.
• when merging / squashing, make sure the fixed issue references are visible in the commits, for easy compilation of release notes

Spacecat-shared PR: adobe/spacecat-shared#1328

If the PR is changing the API specification:

• make sure you add a "Not implemented yet" note the endpoint description, if the implementation is not ready
  yet. Ideally, return a 501 status code with a message explaining the feature is not implemented yet.
• make sure you add at least one example of the request and response.

If the PR is changing the API implementation or an entity exposed through the API:

• make sure you update the API specification and the examples to reflect the changes.

If the PR is introducing a new audit type:

• make sure you update the API specification with the type, schema of the audit result and an example

Related Issues

https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/SITES-40312

Thanks for contributing!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[rpapani]

even if its temporary better to have unit tests to check the contract and avoid unexpected destructions.

[rpapani]

may be we can simplify the checks like

if (!Array.isArray(data.enabled?.sites) || !Array.isArray(data.disabled?.sites) || !Array.isArray(data.enabled?.orgs) || !Array.isArray(data.disabled?.org)) {
     return badRequest('enabled/disabled sites/orgs must be an array');
}

[rpapani]

just realized the tests are missing, so reverted the approval, you're good to merge with tests.