Added support for specifying query pack location. #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GeekMasher
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2025
Contributor
GeekMasher
left a comment
GeekMasher
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We will switch to using resolve packs but I think this is a good idea still
Contributor
Author
|
How are you thinking of implementing the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request introduces enhancements to the CodeQL integration, focusing on configuration flexibility and minor code improvements. The key changes include adding a new configuration option for specifying the path to CodeQL query packs, updating the logic for determining query pack paths, and improving code readability.