-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat(uptime): Add ability to use queues to manage parallelism #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: kafka-consumer-parallel-before
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(uptime): Add ability to use queues to manage parallelism #8
Conversation
One potential problem we have with batch processing is that any one slow item will clog up the whole batch. This pr implements a queueing method instead, where we keep N queues that each have their own workers. There's still a chance of individual items backlogging a queue, but we can try increased concurrency here to reduce the chances of that happening <!-- Describe your PR here. -->
|
@claude review this PR |
|
Claude finished @akshayutture-augment's task —— View job PR Review CompleteI've reviewed this PR which adds a new "thread-queue-parallel" processing mode for managing parallelism in the uptime results consumer. Here's my comprehensive feedback: Architecture & Design ✅Strengths:
Observations:
Implementation Review1. OffsetTracker (src/sentry/remote_subscriptions/consumers/queue_consumer.py:34-106)Good:
Issues:
2. OrderedQueueWorker (lines 108-157)Issues:
3. FixedQueuePool (lines 159-244)Good:
Issues:
4. SimpleQueueProcessingStrategy (lines 246-346)Issues:
5. result_consumer.py ChangesIssues:
6. consumers/init.py Changes (lines 121-122)Good:
Test Coverage 🎯Excellent test coverage! The test file adds 421 lines including: Unit Tests (test_queue_consumer.py)
Integration Tests (test_results_consumer.py)
Minor issues:
Performance & Scalability ConsiderationsStrengths:
Concerns:
Security & Error HandlingGood:
Concerns:
Code Quality & Best PracticesPositives:
Issues:
Recommendations SummaryCritical 🔴
Important 🟡
Nice to Have 🟢
VerdictThis is a solid implementation that adds valuable functionality for managing parallelism. The core algorithm is sound, test coverage is excellent, and it follows established patterns. However, there are some thread-safety and resource management issues that should be addressed before merging:
The changes are well-tested and the new mode fills a legitimate need for parallelism with ordering guarantees. With the critical issues fixed, this would be ready to merge. Estimated Risk: Medium - The thread-safety issues could cause hard-to-debug problems in production under high concurrency. Tasks
|
Test 9
Replicated from ai-code-review-evaluation/sentry-greptile#9