GREP-373: kubectl-grove CLI Plugin #374
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
Introduces GREP-373, a proposal for
kubectl-grove- a kubectl plugin that provides a rich interaction layer for Grove workloads on Kubernetes.The CLI bridges the gap between raw
kubectlcommands and the complex, hierarchical nature of Grove resources (PodCliqueSets, PodGangs, PodCliques, Pods), offering both command-line tools and an interactive Terminal User Interface (TUI) called Arborist.Proposed Features
Critical (Must Have)
kubectl grove tui) - Hierarchical navigation with real-time refresh and embedded topology viewkubectl grove topology) - Rack → Node → Pod visualization with GPU allocation barsHigh Priority
kubectl grove status- PodCliqueSet status with progress visualizationkubectl grove health- Gang-aware health dashboardkubectl grove diagnostics- Comprehensive diagnostic data collectionMedium Priority
rollout,scale,update,restart,applykubectl grove metrics- Live metrics from pod endpointsWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #373
Special notes for your reviewer:
This is a proposal document (GREP) following the template from #362. Looking for feedback on:
Does this PR introduce an API change?
Additional documentation:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code