feat(clients): add generic parameter #4922
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
💥 Breaking changes detected !!Either this PR or a previous PR not released yet introduced breaking changes, be careful when merging. ✔️ Code generated!
📊 Benchmark resultsBenchmarks performed on the method using a mock server, the results might not reflect the real-world performance.
|
algolia-bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
Co-authored-by: Pierre Millot <[email protected]>
algolia-bot
added a commit
to algolia/algoliasearch-client-javascript
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
algolia/api-clients-automation#4922 Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pierre Millot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🧭 What and Why
Some parameters deserve to be generic, to make it easier for the user.
Starting with
saveObject.This is similar to a previous attempt a long time ago: #3151