Skip to content

Conversation

@shortcuts
Copy link
Member

🧭 What and Why

🎟 JIRA Ticket:

Changes included:

discovered while trying #5337, we already check for that in the _is_success method

@shortcuts shortcuts self-assigned this Sep 10, 2025
@algolia-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

algolia-bot commented Sep 10, 2025

✔️ Code generated!

Name Link
🪓 Triggered by 274385f789a7ee212cc498b501b9793e16fd30ba
🍃 Generated commit a10e99190c00825f7398e3d9da780b22516fe3a9
🌲 Generated branch generated/chore/python-redundant-check
📊 Benchmark results

Benchmarks performed on the method using a mock server, the results might not reflect the real-world performance.

Language Req/s
python 1177

@shortcuts shortcuts marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2025 12:33
@shortcuts shortcuts requested a review from a team as a code owner September 10, 2025 12:33
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fluf22 Fluf22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌🏻

@shortcuts shortcuts enabled auto-merge (squash) September 10, 2025 12:35
@shortcuts shortcuts merged commit c87a0a7 into main Sep 10, 2025
17 checks passed
@shortcuts shortcuts deleted the chore/python-redundant-check branch September 10, 2025 12:44
algolia-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-python that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants