Skip to content

Conversation

@jeremyeder
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

jeremyeder and others added 2 commits December 5, 2025 12:31
Users were unable to access reports because examples used ephemeral
container /tmp directory. Updated all examples to show proper pattern:
- Mount writable host directory for output
- Use mounted path for --output-dir
- Reports now accessible on host filesystem

Changes:
- CONTAINER.md: Updated Quick Start, Usage, CI/CD examples
- README.md: Updated Container (Recommended) section
- Added troubleshooting section for ephemeral filesystem issue
- Removed confusing "Save Output Files" section (integrated into examples)

Fixes issue where `podman run --rm -v /repo:/repo:ro agentready assess /repo --output-dir /tmp`
writes reports inside container's ephemeral /tmp, destroyed on exit.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Dependabot only supports bundler v2.* but Gemfile.lock specified v1.17.2.
Updated BUNDLED WITH section to use bundler 2.5.23.

Fixes Dependabot error:
"Dependabot detected the following bundler requirement for your project: '1'.
Currently, the following bundler versions are supported in Dependabot: v2.*."

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2025

🤖 AgentReady Assessment Report

Repository: agentready
Path: /home/runner/work/agentready/agentready
Branch: HEAD | Commit: 6bfc4e03
Assessed: December 05, 2025 at 6:25 PM
AgentReady Version: 2.13.0
Run by: runner@runnervmoqczp


📊 Summary

Metric Value
Overall Score 80.7/100
Certification Level Gold
Attributes Assessed 20/30
Attributes Not Assessed 10
Assessment Duration 1.4s

Languages Detected

  • Python: 140 files
  • Markdown: 115 files
  • YAML: 25 files
  • JSON: 14 files
  • Shell: 6 files
  • XML: 4 files

Repository Stats

  • Total Files: 394
  • Total Lines: 205,493

🎖️ Certification Ladder

  • 💎 Platinum (90-100)
  • 🥇 Gold (75-89) → YOUR LEVEL ←
  • 🥈 Silver (60-74)
  • 🥉 Bronze (40-59)
  • ⚠️ Needs Improvement (0-39)

📋 Detailed Findings

API Documentation

Attribute Tier Status Score
OpenAPI/Swagger Specifications T3 ⊘ not_applicable

Build & Development

Attribute Tier Status Score
One-Command Build/Setup T2 ✅ pass 100
Container/Virtualization Setup T4 ⊘ not_applicable

Code Organization

Attribute Tier Status Score
Separation of Concerns T2 ✅ pass 98

Code Quality

Attribute Tier Status Score
Type Annotations T1 ❌ fail 41
Cyclomatic Complexity Thresholds T3 ✅ pass 100
Semantic Naming T3 ✅ pass 100
Structured Logging T3 ❌ fail 0
Code Smell Elimination T4 ⊘ not_applicable

❌ Type Annotations

Measured: 33.1% (Threshold: ≥80%)

Evidence:

  • Typed functions: 458/1384
  • Coverage: 33.1%
📝 Remediation Steps

Add type annotations to function signatures

  1. For Python: Add type hints to function parameters and return types
  2. For TypeScript: Enable strict mode in tsconfig.json
  3. Use mypy or pyright for Python type checking
  4. Use tsc --strict for TypeScript
  5. Add type annotations gradually to existing code

Commands:

# Python
pip install mypy
mypy --strict src/

# TypeScript
npm install --save-dev typescript
echo '{"compilerOptions": {"strict": true}}' > tsconfig.json

Examples:

# Python - Before
def calculate(x, y):
    return x + y

# Python - After
def calculate(x: float, y: float) -> float:
    return x + y

// TypeScript - tsconfig.json
{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "strict": true,
    "noImplicitAny": true,
    "strictNullChecks": true
  }
}

❌ Structured Logging

Measured: not configured (Threshold: structured logging library)

Evidence:

  • No structured logging library found
  • Checked files: pyproject.toml
  • Using built-in logging module (unstructured)
📝 Remediation Steps

Add structured logging library for machine-parseable logs

  1. Choose structured logging library (structlog for Python, winston for Node.js)
  2. Install library and configure JSON formatter
  3. Add standard fields: timestamp, level, message, context
  4. Include request context: request_id, user_id, session_id
  5. Use consistent field naming (snake_case for Python)
  6. Never log sensitive data (passwords, tokens, PII)
  7. Configure different formats for dev (pretty) and prod (JSON)

Commands:

# Install structlog
pip install structlog

# Configure structlog
# See examples for configuration

Examples:

# Python with structlog
import structlog

# Configure structlog
structlog.configure(
    processors=[
        structlog.stdlib.add_log_level,
        structlog.processors.TimeStamper(fmt="iso"),
        structlog.processors.JSONRenderer()
    ]
)

logger = structlog.get_logger()

# Good: Structured logging
logger.info(
    "user_login",
    user_id="123",
    email="[email protected]",
    ip_address="192.168.1.1"
)

# Bad: Unstructured logging
logger.info(f"User {user_id} logged in from {ip}")

Context Window Optimization

Attribute Tier Status Score
CLAUDE.md Configuration Files T1 ✅ pass 100
File Size Limits T2 ❌ fail 56

❌ File Size Limits

Measured: 2 huge, 8 large out of 141 (Threshold: <5% files >500 lines, 0 files >1000 lines)

Evidence:

  • Found 2 files >1000 lines (1.4% of 141 files)
  • Largest: tests/unit/test_models.py (1192 lines)
📝 Remediation Steps

Refactor large files into smaller, focused modules

  1. Identify files >1000 lines
  2. Split into logical submodules
  3. Extract classes/functions into separate files
  4. Maintain single responsibility principle

Examples:

# Split large file:
# models.py (1500 lines) → models/user.py, models/product.py, models/order.py

Dependency Management

Attribute Tier Status Score
Lock Files for Reproducibility T1 ✅ pass 100
Dependency Freshness & Security T2 ⊘ not_applicable

Documentation

Attribute Tier Status Score
Concise Documentation T2 ❌ fail 64
Inline Documentation T2 ✅ pass 100

❌ Concise Documentation

Measured: 305 lines, 47 headings, 33 bullets (Threshold: <500 lines, structured format)

Evidence:

  • README length: 305 lines (good)
  • Heading density: 15.4 per 100 lines (target: 3-5)
  • 1 paragraphs exceed 10 lines (walls of text)
📝 Remediation Steps

Make documentation more concise and structured

  1. Break long README into multiple documents (docs/ directory)
  2. Add clear Markdown headings (##, ###) for structure
  3. Convert prose paragraphs to bullet points where possible
  4. Add table of contents for documents >100 lines
  5. Use code blocks instead of describing commands in prose
  6. Move detailed content to wiki or docs/, keep README focused

Commands:

# Check README length
wc -l README.md

# Count headings
grep -c '^#' README.md

Examples:

# Good: Concise with structure

## Quick Start
```bash
pip install -e .
agentready assess .

Features

  • Fast repository scanning
  • HTML and Markdown reports
  • 25 agent-ready attributes

Documentation

See docs/ for detailed guides.

Bad: Verbose prose

This project is a tool that helps you assess your repository
against best practices for AI-assisted development. It works by
scanning your codebase and checking for various attributes that
make repositories more effective when working with AI coding
assistants like Claude Code...

[Many more paragraphs of prose...]


</details>

### Documentation Standards

| Attribute | Tier | Status | Score |
|-----------|------|--------|-------|
| README Structure | T1 | ✅ pass | 100 |
| Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) | T3 | ❌ fail | 0 |
| Architecture Decision Records | T3 | ⊘ not_applicable | — |

#### ❌ Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

**Measured**: no ADR directory (Threshold: ADR directory with decisions)

**Evidence**:
- No ADR directory found (checked docs/adr/, .adr/, adr/, docs/decisions/)

<details><summary><strong>📝 Remediation Steps</strong></summary>


Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) directory and document key decisions

1. Create docs/adr/ directory in repository root
2. Use Michael Nygard ADR template or MADR format
3. Document each significant architectural decision
4. Number ADRs sequentially (0001-*.md, 0002-*.md)
5. Include Status, Context, Decision, and Consequences sections
6. Update ADR status when decisions are revised (Superseded, Deprecated)

**Commands**:

```bash
# Create ADR directory
mkdir -p docs/adr

# Create first ADR using template
cat > docs/adr/0001-use-architecture-decision-records.md << 'EOF'
# 1. Use Architecture Decision Records

Date: 2025-11-22

## Status
Accepted

## Context
We need to record architectural decisions made in this project.

## Decision
We will use Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) as described by Michael Nygard.

## Consequences
- Decisions are documented with context
- Future contributors understand rationale
- ADRs are lightweight and version-controlled
EOF

Examples:

# Example ADR Structure

```markdown
# 2. Use PostgreSQL for Database

Date: 2025-11-22

## Status
Accepted

## Context
We need a relational database for complex queries and ACID transactions.
Team has PostgreSQL experience. Need full-text search capabilities.

## Decision
Use PostgreSQL 15+ as primary database.

## Consequences
- Positive: Robust ACID, full-text search, team familiarity
- Negative: Higher resource usage than SQLite
- Neutral: Need to manage migrations, backups

</details>

### Git & Version Control

| Attribute | Tier | Status | Score |
|-----------|------|--------|-------|
| Conventional Commit Messages | T2 | ❌ fail | 0 |
| .gitignore Completeness | T2 | ✅ pass | 100 |
| Branch Protection Rules | T4 | ⊘ not_applicable | — |
| Issue & Pull Request Templates | T4 | ⊘ not_applicable | — |

#### ❌ Conventional Commit Messages

**Measured**: not configured (Threshold: configured)

**Evidence**:
- No commitlint or husky configuration

<details><summary><strong>📝 Remediation Steps</strong></summary>


Configure conventional commits with commitlint

1. Install commitlint
2. Configure husky for commit-msg hook

**Commands**:

```bash
npm install --save-dev @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional husky

Performance

Attribute Tier Status Score
Performance Benchmarks T4 ⊘ not_applicable

Repository Structure

Attribute Tier Status Score
Standard Project Layouts T1 ✅ pass 100
Issue & Pull Request Templates T3 ✅ pass 100
Separation of Concerns T2 ⊘ not_applicable

Security

Attribute Tier Status Score
Security Scanning Automation T4 ⊘ not_applicable

Testing & CI/CD

Attribute Tier Status Score
Test Coverage Requirements T2 ✅ pass 100
Pre-commit Hooks & CI/CD Linting T2 ✅ pass 100
CI/CD Pipeline Visibility T3 ✅ pass 80

🎯 Next Steps

Priority Improvements (highest impact first):

  1. Type Annotations (Tier 1) - +10.0 points potential
    • Add type annotations to function signatures
  2. Conventional Commit Messages (Tier 2) - +3.0 points potential
    • Configure conventional commits with commitlint
  3. File Size Limits (Tier 2) - +3.0 points potential
    • Refactor large files into smaller, focused modules
  4. Concise Documentation (Tier 2) - +3.0 points potential
    • Make documentation more concise and structured
  5. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) (Tier 3) - +1.5 points potential
    • Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) directory and document key decisions

📝 Assessment Metadata

  • AgentReady Version: v2.13.0
  • Research Version: v1.0.0
  • Repository Snapshot: 6bfc4e0
  • Assessment Duration: 1.4s
  • Assessed By: runner@runnervmoqczp
  • Assessment Date: December 05, 2025 at 6:25 PM

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@jeremyeder jeremyeder merged commit c6874ea into main Dec 5, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.14.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels