-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
Proposal - Koin Local Setup #183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…efensive approach by testing Koin
Summary of ChangesHello @arnaudgiuliani, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Koin dependency injection setup within two example activities, Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully refactors the Koin setup in KoinModularActivity and KoinViewModelsActivity to use local Koin contexts instead of a global one. This is an excellent improvement that makes the examples more isolated and robust, preventing potential side effects between different samples. The implementation uses modern Koin APIs like koinApplication and the KoinApplication composable correctly. My feedback includes one suggestion to improve code organization for better long-term maintainability.
| private val appModule = module { | ||
| viewModelOf(::RouteBViewModel) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For improved readability and code organization, it's a common convention to declare top-level properties like appModule before the classes that use them. Consider moving this module definition to the top of the file, after the import statements. This allows developers reading the file to see the dependencies at a glance before diving into the component's implementation.
In the existing samples that use Koin, we are testing whether Koin has already started. This is quite defensive and not really scaling for the coming examples.
I propose to change to:
KoinApplication()for a simple Compose entry point inKoinViewModelsActivity.koinApplication { }to setup a local Koin instance inKoinModularActivity.This way, we don't need to check if Koin has been started.