-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
Address Gemini code assist recommendations #368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Change-Id: Idd34787d0ff31601fc09d034a69cdd20e8287be8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @alabiaga, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the code quality and maintainability of the sharing functionality within the samples/user-interface/share module. It incorporates recommendations from Gemini code assist, primarily by refactoring conditional logic for better readability and introducing constants to eliminate magic values, resulting in cleaner and more robust code.
Highlights
- Code Readability and Conciseness: Refactored the
ShareResultReceiverclass to use Kotlin's?.letscope function for handling nullableChooserResultobjects, making the logging logic more concise and readable. - Removal of Unused Code: Removed the
CHOOSER_RESULT_UNKNOWNconstant and its corresponding import, as it was no longer utilized in theShareResultReceiver. - Improved Maintainability with Constants: Introduced
private const valdeclarations for plain text content, type, and a request code inShareSender.kt, replacing hardcoded string literals and integers to enhance code maintainability and reduce magic values.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the sharing logic based on recommendations from Gemini Code Assist. The changes include removing unused imports, using idiomatic Kotlin constructs like let, and replacing magic strings and numbers with named constants. These are all positive changes that improve code quality and maintainability. I have one suggestion to apply the new constants more broadly for better consistency within the file.
| private const val PLAIN_TEXT_CONTENT = "Hello, world!" | ||
| private const val PLAIN_TEXT_TYPE = "text/plain" | ||
| private const val SHARE_TEXT_REQUEST_CODE = 1234 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's great that you've extracted these magic values into constants. To improve consistency across the file, I'd suggest two further improvements:
- Use the new constants
PLAIN_TEXT_TYPEandPLAIN_TEXT_CONTENTin theknowReceiverfunction, which currently uses the same hardcoded strings. - The
knowReceiverfunction also uses a magic number1for itsPendingIntentrequest code. Consider extracting this into a named constant as well, similar to what you've done withSHARE_TEXT_REQUEST_CODE.
Change-Id: Idd34787d0ff31601fc09d034a69cdd20e8287be8