Skip to content

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

The example that shows a datepicker inside a dialog looked weird. These changes fix it up.

The example that shows a datepicker inside a dialog looked weird. These changes fix it up.
@crisbeto crisbeto added the target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release label Aug 10, 2025
@crisbeto crisbeto requested a review from a team as a code owner August 10, 2025 08:09
@crisbeto crisbeto requested review from mmalerba and ok7sai and removed request for a team August 10, 2025 08:09
@angular-robot angular-robot bot added area: docs Related to the documentation area: material/datepicker labels Aug 10, 2025
@crisbeto crisbeto removed the request for review from mmalerba August 11, 2025 19:44
@crisbeto crisbeto added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Aug 11, 2025
@crisbeto crisbeto merged commit e478208 into angular:main Aug 11, 2025
30 of 32 checks passed
@crisbeto
Copy link
Member Author

The changes were merged into the following branches: main, 20.1.x

crisbeto added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
The example that shows a datepicker inside a dialog looked weird. These changes fix it up.

(cherry picked from commit e478208)
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 11, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker area: docs Related to the documentation area: material/datepicker target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants