[PR #10079/1936fe51 backport][stable-10] crypttab: removes jijna delimiters from example using when#10080
Merged
felixfontein merged 1 commit intostable-10from Apr 29, 2025
Conversation
Collaborator
ansibullbot
added
backport
docs
docs_only
module
felixfontein
deleted the
patchback/backports/stable-10/1936fe5181f970d18d24b6165165e854f3b30a77/pr-10079
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of PR #10079 as merged into main (1936fe5).
SUMMARY
The current example includes extra jinja delimiters which
result in double-interpretation of the statement.
Fixes: #10078
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Kasurde Akasurde@redhat.com
ISSUE TYPE