Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/docsite/rst/conf.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@
'jinja2': ('http://jinja.palletsprojects.com/', None),
'ansible_2_9': ('https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/2.9/', None),
'ansible_11': ('https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/11/', None),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should ansible_11 be kept for now (until that's EOL), or should it be removed now?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@felixfontein I think we should keep it. I looked at a similar commit on the stable-2.18 branch: 036ef72

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although I guess for stable-2.19 it was different: da2f837

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm. From the checklist @samccann references a PR as an example, which removes the previous intersphinx links: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-documentation/pull/878/files

I guess we should remove ansible_11 and make a small change to stable-2.18 too.

'ansible_12': ('https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/12/', None),
}

# linckchecker settings
Expand Down