Skip to content

Conversation

@guptadivya1501
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.


pydpf-post_251:
name: "PyDPF-Post with 251"
pydpf-post_252:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guptadivya1501 We will also need retrocompatibility tests with 251, just like for 242 below

uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: ${{ github.event.inputs.ansys_version || '251' }}
ANSYS_VERSION: ${{ github.event.inputs.ansys_version || '252' }}
Copy link
Contributor

@PProfizi PProfizi Oct 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guptadivya1501 We will also need a retro_251 test just like for retro_241. We actually also need a retro_242 which we must have forgotten to set when switching to 251

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.97%. Comparing base (3ad9835) to head (009e8bb).
Report is 66 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1791      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.10%   86.97%   -1.14%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines        9965     9951      -14     
==========================================
- Hits         8780     8655     -125     
- Misses       1185     1296     +111     

Comment on lines +113 to +132
retro_251:
name: "retro 251"
uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: "251"
python_versions: '["3.9"]'
standalone_suffix: '.sp01'
DOCSTRING: false
secrets: inherit

retro_242:
name: "retro 242"
uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: "242"
python_versions: '["3.9"]'
standalone_suffix: '.sp01'
DOCSTRING: false
secrets: inherit

Copy link
Contributor

@PProfizi PProfizi Oct 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
retro_251:
name: "retro 251"
uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: "251"
python_versions: '["3.9"]'
standalone_suffix: '.sp01'
DOCSTRING: false
secrets: inherit
retro_242:
name: "retro 242"
uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: "242"
python_versions: '["3.9"]'
standalone_suffix: '.sp01'
DOCSTRING: false
secrets: inherit
retro_251:
name: "retro 251"
uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: "251"
python_versions: '["3.9"]'
DOCSTRING: false
secrets: inherit
retro_242:
name: "retro 242"
uses: ./.github/workflows/tests.yml
with:
ANSYS_VERSION: "242"
python_versions: '["3.9"]'
DOCSTRING: false
secrets: inherit

@ansjhajjar
Copy link
Contributor

@PProfizi should we close this PR ?

@PProfizi PProfizi closed this Nov 26, 2024
@PProfizi PProfizi deleted the dgupta/1134558_252 branch November 28, 2024 14:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants