Skip to content

Conversation

@pyansys-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

An update of generated code has been triggered either manually or by an update in the dpf-standalone repository.

@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2025 07:47
@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot added the server-sync DO NOT USE, Related to automatic synchronization with the server label Nov 14, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Some tests with 'continue-on-error: true' have failed:

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 45.99%. Comparing base (6dc6db5) to head (5c81314).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2745       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   84.43%   45.99%   -38.44%     
===========================================
  Files          92       92               
  Lines       10916    10916               
===========================================
- Hits         9217     5021     -4196     
- Misses       1699     5895     +4196     

Outputs
-------
field: Field
extracted: Field or FieldsContainer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cbellot000 AI...

elif forced_value is not None:
warn(
DeprecationWarning(
f'Operator default_value: Input name "forced_value" is deprecated in favor of "primary_value".'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cbellot000 was this change intentional? Forced value makes more sense to me

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought it makes sense but it's not strongly required. I can revert if needed @rafacanton

@rafacanton
Copy link
Contributor

All errors have been investigated and assigned - closing

@rafacanton rafacanton closed this Nov 14, 2025
@rafacanton rafacanton deleted the maint/update_code_for_261_daily_on_main branch November 14, 2025 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

server-sync DO NOT USE, Related to automatic synchronization with the server

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants