-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Fix skin result extraction based on list of elements #532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
24 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2734aaa
Fix wrong input name for solid_to_skin operator
PProfizi cd4746b
Fix retro
PProfizi 548aa0c
Merge branch 'master' into fix/skin_result_extraction
PProfizi dab0442
Working modif, let's try to add mesh_by_scop back for performance
PProfizi fe7a25e
Cannot add mesh_by_scop back as it is actually the source of the problem
PProfizi 552b032
Add testing
PProfizi b040a22
Start fixing refs of tests
PProfizi 15308a2
Fix refs of tests for current server
PProfizi 3bc8779
Fix refs of tests
PProfizi e3393a0
Fix refs of tests
PProfizi 8f81e3d
Fix typo
PProfizi 29926b8
WIP
PProfizi f6161a4
Use "initial_mesh_wf_out" name
PProfizi a43d2fb
Use "result_mesh" name
PProfizi c34562a
WIP
PProfizi d7f1189
Fix mesh connection
PProfizi fa8aa84
Update 02-mesh-skin.py example with titles to plots
PProfizi adc8a46
Remove progress bar from selection workflows
PProfizi e24b07a
Remove progress bar from initial mesh workflow
PProfizi 72c1d14
Temporary hack to remove mesh cached in model's streams
PProfizi f15e96c
Add tests WIP
PProfizi 2d37b76
Apply suggestions from code review
PProfizi 039ab55
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix/skin_result_extraction' into…
PProfizi e5abaad
Remove dirty trick to reset model.metadata now a fix has been made
PProfizi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how confident are we all these unit tests changes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you plot all of these to make sure they were good?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cbellot000 Yes, I debugged most of them locally to check the actual number of elements involved and whether the new reference is correct this time. This is why I switched to NamedSelections for most of them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can now duplicate all these tests once with reduce_mesh=True, where we should have the same results as before, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cbellot000 I started making specific tests for when we use
reduce_mesh, but I do not think we need to duplicate all of the already existing ones for each result.