Skip to content

Update pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio.py#55

Open
xm101 wants to merge 1 commit intoantgroup:mainfrom
xm101:main
Open

Update pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio.py#55
xm101 wants to merge 1 commit intoantgroup:mainfrom
xm101:main

Conversation

@xm101
Copy link

@xm101 xm101 commented Oct 17, 2025

类型问题

Summary by Sourcery

Fix batch size calculation to support list-type prompt embeddings in pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio.

Bug Fixes:

  • Use len() for prompt_embeds when it’s a list instead of accessing shape, avoiding TypeError in encode_prompt
  • Apply the same len()-based batch size logic for list-type prompt_embeds in the call method

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Refactored batch size logic in pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio.py to handle list-type prompt_embeds gracefully by using len() when appropriate.

Class diagram for updated batch size logic in encode_prompt and call

classDiagram
class pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio {
  encode_prompt(prompt, prompt_embeds)
  __call__(prompt, prompt_embeds)
}
pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio : encode_prompt()
pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio : __call__()
pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio : batch_size

class encode_prompt {
  +prompt
  +prompt_embeds
  +batch_size
}
class __call__ {
  +prompt
  +prompt_embeds
  +batch_size
}
pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio --> encode_prompt
pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio --> __call__
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Enhanced batch_size computation to support list-based prompt_embeds
  • In encode_prompt, use len() if prompt_embeds is a list
  • In call, apply the same isinstance list check when determining batch_size
src/pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @xm101, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

此拉取请求解决了 pipeline_wan_fun_inpaint_audio.py 文件中的一个类型相关问题。具体来说,它优化了 batch_size 的确定逻辑,确保当 prompt_embeds 作为列表传入时也能兼容,从而避免了在列表上访问 shape[0] 可能导致的错误。这增强了管道的健壮性。

Highlights

  • 修复类型问题: 调整了 batch_size 的计算方式,以正确处理 prompt_embeds 为列表类型的情况,避免潜在的属性访问错误。
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

本次 PR 修复了一个当 prompt_embeds 作为列表传递时导致 AttributeError 的类型问题。您在 encode_prompt__call__ 方法中都添加了检查,以正确处理 prompt_embeds 可能是列表或张量的情况,从而确定 batch_size

这个修复是正确且必要的。我只提一个关于代码重复的次要建议,以提高未来的可维护性。总体而言,这是一个很好的修复。

batch_size = len(prompt)
else:
batch_size = prompt_embeds.shape[0]
batch_size = len(prompt_embeds) if isinstance(prompt_embeds, list) else prompt_embeds.shape[0]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

这个获取 batch_size 的逻辑在 __call__ 方法的第 558 行存在重复。为了提高代码的可维护性并避免未来可能出现的不一致,建议将此逻辑提取到一个共享的辅助函数中。虽然这超出了当前修复的范围,但值得在未来的重构中考虑。

batch_size = len(prompt)
else:
batch_size = prompt_embeds.shape[0]
batch_size = len(prompt_embeds) if isinstance(prompt_embeds, list) else prompt_embeds.shape[0]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

这个获取 batch_size 的逻辑在 encode_prompt 方法的第 281 行存在重复。为了提高代码的可维护性并避免未来可能出现的不一致,建议将此逻辑提取到一个共享的辅助函数中。虽然这超出了当前修复的范围,但值得在未来的重构中考虑。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant