fix(java): ATN.getExpectedTokens expects RuleTransition but gets EpsilonTransition (issue #4843)#4888
Open
Dr-Bluemond wants to merge 1 commit intoantlr:devfrom
Open
fix(java): ATN.getExpectedTokens expects RuleTransition but gets EpsilonTransition (issue #4843)#4888Dr-Bluemond wants to merge 1 commit intoantlr:devfrom
Dr-Bluemond wants to merge 1 commit intoantlr:devfrom
Conversation
…lonTransition (issue antlr#4843)
Contributor
|
This problem exists in at least one other target (see the CSharp code). Shouldn't the fix be applied across all targets? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolved the issue raised in #4843. According to the convention, invokingState.transition(0) should be a RuleTransition, but I found that sometimes it can also be an EpsilonTransition. So I tried following this EpsilonTransition to find the actual RuleTransition.
The method to reproduce this issue can be found in the issue #4843