feat: perform all BlockComponent checks in blockstore processor#594
Merged
ksn6 merged 5 commits intoanza-xyz:masterfrom Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Conversation
AshwinSekar
reviewed
Nov 10, 2025
AshwinSekar
reviewed
Nov 10, 2025
AshwinSekar
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2025
AshwinSekar
pushed a commit
to AshwinSekar/alpenglow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2026
…za-xyz#594) Right now, we need to complete replay to verify that `BlockComponent`s in a block satisfy a number of invariants (e.g., exactly one header, exactly one footer, etc.). @AshwinSekar found a clever way to avoid this: anza-xyz#575 (comment). Implement the above.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem and Summary of Changes
Right now, we need to complete replay to verify that
BlockComponents in a block satisfy a number of invariants (e.g., exactly one header, exactly one footer, etc.).@AshwinSekar found a clever way to avoid this: #575 (comment).
Implement the above.