Extend PartitionedAssetTimetable to allow per asset partition#60966
Open
Lee-W wants to merge 9 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Open
Extend PartitionedAssetTimetable to allow per asset partition#60966Lee-W wants to merge 9 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Lee-W wants to merge 9 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Lee-W
changed the title
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
6 times, most recently
from
4f7d47c to
463e306
Compare
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
6 times, most recently
from
b516821 to
ce928f8
Compare
Lee-W
changed the title
Lee-W
requested review from
amoghrajesh,
ashb,
bolkedebruin,
kaxil and
uranusjr
as code owners
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
2 times, most recently
from
dee403b to
587fd5b
Compare
uranusjr
reviewed
Feb 9, 2026
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
2 times, most recently
from
58253a2 to
568528a
Compare
uranusjr
reviewed
Feb 10, 2026
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8ec2ee0 to
bd8c91d
Compare
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
from
bd8c91d to
4c80db9
Compare
1 task
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
per-asset-partition-mapper
branch
from
4c80db9 to
8c9d2ed
Compare
dstandish
reviewed
Feb 16, 2026
| self, | ||
| *, | ||
| assets: SerializedAssetBase, | ||
| partition_mapper_mapping: dict[SerializedAssetBase, PartitionMapper] | None = None, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just brainstorming naming ideas
we could possibly call it partition_mapper_config or mapping_config or something ... just a thought though i'm not sure what's better
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a difficult one. I think the partition_mapper_mapping makes sense to me but is kind of hard to understand at first glance. partition_mapper_config sounds like a great option but open to any better option!
dstandish
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2026
guan404ming
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2026
| self, | ||
| *, | ||
| assets: SerializedAssetBase, | ||
| partition_mapper_mapping: dict[SerializedAssetBase, PartitionMapper] | None = None, |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a difficult one. I think the partition_mapper_mapping makes sense to me but is kind of hard to understand at first glance. partition_mapper_config sounds like a great option but open to any better option!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
closes: #57694
What
default_partition_mapperandpartition_mapper_mappingtoPartitionedAssetTimetable.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.