Run fab provider tests in v2-11-test#61633
Open
potiuk wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:v2-11-testfrom
Open
Conversation
amoghrajesh
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2026
540a862 to
38a9bf0
Compare
d1428ac to
d95280a
Compare
d95280a to
b7e059b
Compare
5f4fa9d to
7fd7bf8
Compare
Since we are releasing fab provider from v2-11-test we should also run fab provider tests there. This chang consists of: * migrating to FAB 4.5.3 (includes scrypt algorithm fix) * monkeypatching flask-session so that it works well with new flask-sqlalchey * caching initial$aization of Session class from flask-session and AirflowDatabaseSessionInterface so that DB connection is not created multiple times during tests * fixing imports from tests
7fd7bf8 to
3957680
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since we are releasing fab provider from v2-11-test we should also run fab provider tests there.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.