-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Bump SLF4J from 1.7.30 to 2.0.16. #33574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 10 commits
4b124cb
f3636ff
440bd2a
0f4e5f1
fd01768
fd16148
bcc3465
43ddc02
f452f05
40cdc9d
b810034
6ac9b97
cc21ecd
bdbb72e
1710eff
d6b56c6
935a637
cb62acb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ dependencies { | |
| implementation library.java.commons_lang3 | ||
| implementation library.java.joda_time | ||
| implementation library.java.slf4j_api | ||
| implementation library.java.spark_streaming | ||
| implementation library.java.spark_core | ||
| implementation library.java.spark3_streaming | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. let's move sparkreceiver/2 to sparkreceiver/3 or simply sparkreceiver/. The package name is unchanged so that release is unchanged.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I sent an email to dev list regarding this change. I will wait a couple days to see if there is any objection or other suggestion. |
||
| implementation library.java.spark3_core | ||
| implementation library.java.vendored_guava_32_1_2_jre | ||
| implementation project(path: ":sdks:java:core", configuration: "shadow") | ||
| compileOnly "org.scala-lang:scala-library:2.11.12" | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why are they needed? tests currently using Java11 should be fine as https://openjdk.org/jeps/403 is enforced in Java16+ only.
Did you run tests on Java 17+ locally? If so did the test experience similar issue on master branch?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just took them out and triggered the tests again on github. Will see.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like the test is fine. However, still good to confirm