-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
[Java] Dataflow runner v1 - Propagate drain mode #36534
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @stankiewicz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements the propagation of a 'drain mode' flag throughout the Apache Beam Dataflow runner's Java worker. This enhancement allows the system to accurately track and react to a job's draining state, which is vital for managing resources and ensuring data integrity during graceful shutdowns. The changes involve updates to the core protocol buffer definitions, modifications to key worker components that handle work items and timers, and extensions to the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #36534 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 55.08% 56.91% +1.83%
- Complexity 1667 3395 +1728
============================================
Files 1059 1221 +162
Lines 165366 186546 +21180
Branches 1195 3544 +2349
============================================
+ Hits 91091 106180 +15089
- Misses 72104 76997 +4893
- Partials 2171 3369 +1198
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
54c52fd to
204175b
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request propagates the drainMode flag through various layers of the Dataflow runner, from work item reception down to the creation of TimerData and WindowedValue. The changes are mostly plumbing the new parameter through method calls and constructors.
My review has identified a high-severity issue where the drainMode is not actually applied when creating TimerData, and a couple of areas with duplicated and unnecessarily complex logic for decoding the drain mode. Addressing these points will ensure the feature is correctly implemented and improve code maintainability.
...va/worker/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/dataflow/worker/UngroupedWindmillReader.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...java/worker/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/dataflow/worker/WindmillKeyedWorkItem.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Assigning reviewers: R: @kennknowles added as fallback since no labels match configuration Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
|
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
|
R: @kennknowles can you do first pass? |
...ava/worker/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/dataflow/worker/WindmillTimerInternals.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...va/worker/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/dataflow/worker/UngroupedWindmillReader.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kennknowles
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any new tests for this? I guess it could be somewhat tricky to test or perhaps we have them run internally?
...ava/org/apache/beam/runners/dataflow/worker/windmill/client/grpc/GrpcWindmillServerTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Run Java PreCommit |
First part: #36524
Adds:
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.