-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Fix warning message #36703
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix warning message #36703
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1507,25 +1507,28 @@ def _check_fn_use_yield_and_return(fn): | |
| source_code = _get_function_body_without_inners(fn) | ||
| has_yield = False | ||
| has_return = False | ||
| return_none_warning = ( | ||
| "No iterator is returned by the process method in %s.", | ||
| fn.__self__.__class__) | ||
| has_return_none = False | ||
| for line in source_code.split("\n"): | ||
| lstripped_line = line.lstrip() | ||
| if lstripped_line.startswith("yield ") or lstripped_line.startswith( | ||
| "yield("): | ||
| has_yield = True | ||
| if lstripped_line.startswith("return ") or lstripped_line.startswith( | ||
| elif lstripped_line.rstrip() == "return": | ||
| has_return_none = True | ||
| elif lstripped_line.startswith("return ") or lstripped_line.startswith( | ||
| "return("): | ||
| has_return = True | ||
| if lstripped_line.startswith( | ||
| "return None") or lstripped_line.rstrip() == "return": | ||
| _LOGGER.warning(return_none_warning) | ||
| if lstripped_line.startswith("return None"): | ||
Abacn marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| has_return_none = True | ||
| else: | ||
|
||
| has_return = True | ||
| if has_yield and has_return: | ||
| return True | ||
|
|
||
| if not has_yield and not has_return: | ||
| _LOGGER.warning(return_none_warning) | ||
| if not has_yield and not has_return and has_return_none: | ||
Abacn marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| _LOGGER.warning( | ||
| "Process method returned None (element won't be emitted): %s. Check if intended.", | ||
| fn.__self__.__class__) | ||
| print(has_yield, has_return, has_return_none) | ||
Abacn marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
| return False | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can even skip this case? It seems like the only potentially problematic case is when they're expecting
Noneto be processed downstream, in this case I think they probably have correct expectationsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, updated. now both "return" and "return sth" will go to "has_return" (we still need to track all return statements to issue warning in the case both yield and return are used)