Skip to content

Conversation

@reshke
Copy link
Contributor

@reshke reshke commented Dec 22, 2025

This pr fixes https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2023-5868 in cloudberry

https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=3b0776fde56763c549df35ce9750f3399bc710b2

===

transformAggregateCall() captures the datatypes of the aggregate's arguments immediately to construct the Aggref.aggargtypes list. This seems reasonable because the arguments have already been transformed --- but there is an edge case where they haven't been. Specifically, if we have an unknown-type literal in an ANY argument position, nothing will have been done with it earlier. But if we also have DISTINCT, then addTargetToGroupList() converts the literal to "text" type, resulting in the aggargtypes list not matching the actual runtime type of the argument. The end result is that the aggregate tries to interpret a "text" value as being of type "unknown", that is a zero-terminated C string. If the text value contains no zero bytes, this could result in disclosure of server memory following the text literal value.

To fix, move the collection of the aggargtypes list to the end of transformAggregateCall(), after DISTINCT has been handled. This requires slightly more code, but not a great deal.

Our thanks to Jingzhou Fu for reporting this problem.

Security: CVE-2023-5868

transformAggregateCall() captures the datatypes of the aggregate's
arguments immediately to construct the Aggref.aggargtypes list.
This seems reasonable because the arguments have already been
transformed --- but there is an edge case where they haven't been.
Specifically, if we have an unknown-type literal in an ANY argument
position, nothing will have been done with it earlier.  But if we
also have DISTINCT, then addTargetToGroupList() converts the literal
to "text" type, resulting in the aggargtypes list not matching the
actual runtime type of the argument.  The end result is that the
aggregate tries to interpret a "text" value as being of type
"unknown", that is a zero-terminated C string.  If the text value
contains no zero bytes, this could result in disclosure of server
memory following the text literal value.

To fix, move the collection of the aggargtypes list to the end
of transformAggregateCall(), after DISTINCT has been handled.
This requires slightly more code, but not a great deal.

Our thanks to Jingzhou Fu for reporting this problem.

Security: CVE-2023-5868
@reshke reshke merged commit f35b332 into apache:main Dec 22, 2025
166 of 172 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants