-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
pom.xml: revert systemvm template version to 4.20.0.0 #10004
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pom.xml: revert systemvm template version to 4.20.0.0 #10004
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #10004 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 15.80% 15.80%
Complexity 12586 12586
=========================================
Files 5627 5627
Lines 492343 492343
Branches 59694 59694
=========================================
Hits 77828 77828
Misses 405992 405992
Partials 8523 8523
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 11638 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11642 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11814)
|
Description
This PR reverts systemvm template version to 4.20.0.0
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?