Removal of UI blockage to access the changeOfferingForVolume API

[LayonRibeiro]

Description

This PR corrects an incorrect behavior in the UI where users who have access to the changeOfferingForVolume API, but are not admins, cannot use it.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Before

After

How Has This Been Tested?

1. A role was created (based on the default user role) with permission to access the changeOfferingForVolume API.

2. An account and a user were created using this role.

3. The changeOfferingForVolume API icon appeared correctly in the UI (npm run server).

4. The change in the volume offer was made correctly

[shwstppr]

@blueorangutan ui

[blueorangutan]

@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.30%. Comparing base (0934fb1) to head (376bd4f).
⚠️ Report is 574 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #10135      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.30%   16.30%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    13450    13447       -3     
============================================
  Files          5675     5675              
  Lines        499249   499249              
  Branches      60377    60377              
============================================
- Hits          81425    81420       -5     
- Misses       408753   408757       +4     
- Partials       9071     9072       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.99% <ø> (ø)
unittests	17.16% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/10135 (QA-JID-504)

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan ui

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/10135 (QA-JID-638)

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[rosi-shapeblue]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@rosi-shapeblue a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14654

[rosi-shapeblue]

Verification passed. Working as expected.

Tested with a non-admin user assigned to a custom role allowing changeOfferingForVolume. The “Change Offering” icon is now visible in the UI, and the offering change works as expected.

NOTE: Minor UI i18n issue: message.change.offering.for.volume.processing key is shown instead of a user-friendly message.

Screencast.from.2025-10-12.17-01-11.webm

LGTM.

[DaanHoogland]

@shwstppr @weizhouapache , are you gouys alright with this to merge now?

[weizhouapache]

code lgtm