UI: Fill username & domain fields in login, forgotPassword and resetPassword page from url

[vishesh92]

Description

If the URL params contains username or domain, it will use the values for the username and domain field in Login, forgot password and reset password page. This feature would be useful if you want to open a page which has prefilled usename and/or domain. To test the forgot password and reset password page, you need to enable the user.password.reset.enabled global setting.

e.g. The below url will look like this when opened.

https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/10291/#/user/login?username=admin&domain=ABC

Generated description

This pull request includes changes to the forms in the authentication views to support additional query parameters. The most important changes involve updating the ForgotPassword, Login, and ResetPassword components to include username and domain from the route query.

Enhancements to authentication forms:

• ui/src/views/auth/ForgotPassword.vue: Added username and domain to the reactive form object, using values from the route query if available.
• ui/src/views/auth/Login.vue: Added username and domain to the reactive form object, using values from the route query if available.
• ui/src/views/auth/ResetPassword.vue: Added domain to the reactive form object, using values from the route query if available.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.15%. Comparing base (33a37da) to head (132ce29).
Report is 54 commits behind head on 4.20.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #10291      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.15%   16.15%   -0.01%     
  Complexity    12987    12987              
============================================
  Files          5639     5639              
  Lines        494148   494153       +5     
  Branches      59916    59923       +7     
============================================
  Hits          79854    79854              
- Misses       405465   405470       +5     
  Partials       8829     8829              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.02% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	17.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan ui

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/10291 (QA-JID-536)

[DaanHoogland]

code looks good

[DaanHoogland]

@vishesh92 can you please add some testing guidance in the description?

[vishesh92]

@vishesh92 can you please add some testing guidance in the description?

@DaanHoogland updated the description.

[DaanHoogland]

tested in qa

[NuxRo]

lgtm, great idea